Recent Developments in Metallic Degradable Micromotors for Biomedical and Environmental Remediation Applications

发布时间:2026-03-10 10:32

绿色建筑是LEED(Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)等认证体系的一部分 #生活常识# #环保生活Tips# #绿色建筑#

Highlights

This review discusses the potential of degradable metallic micromotors for a variety of biomedical and environmental applications.

The design principles, fabrication techniques and degradation mechanisms of degradable metallic micromotors are reviewed in detail.

Challenges and future directions for the development of degradable metallic micromotors for real-life applications are presented.

Keywords: Magnesium, Zinc, Iron, Biodegradable microrobot, Biomedical, Environmental

Abstract

Synthetic micromotor has gained substantial attention in biomedicine and environmental remediation. Metal-based degradable micromotor composed of magnesium (Mg), zinc (Zn), and iron (Fe) have promise due to their nontoxic fuel-free propulsion, favorable biocompatibility, and safe excretion of degradation products Recent advances in degradable metallic micromotor have shown their fast movement in complex biological media, efficient cargo delivery and favorable biocompatibility. A noteworthy number of degradable metal-based micromotors employ bubble propulsion, utilizing water as fuel to generate hydrogen bubbles. This novel feature has projected degradable metallic micromotors for active in vivo drug delivery applications. In addition, understanding the degradation mechanism of these micromotors is also a key parameter for their design and performance. Its propulsion efficiency and life span govern the overall performance of a degradable metallic micromotor. Here we review the design and recent advancements of metallic degradable micromotors. Furthermore, we describe the controlled degradation, efficient in vivo drug delivery, and built-in acid neutralization capabilities of degradable micromotors with versatile biomedical applications. Moreover, we discuss micromotors’ efficacy in detecting and destroying environmental pollutants. Finally, we address the limitations and future research directions of degradable metallic micromotors.graphic file with name 40820_2023_1259_Figa_HTML.jpg

Introduction

Microorganisms, which are ubiquitous in nature, are equipped with micromachines that enable autonomous propulsion and responses to external stimuli. Inspired by the remarkable properties of these organisms, the concept of microrobots has attracted considerable attention. These microrobots are diminutive synthetic devices that convert external or internal energy sources into motion. Extensive research has been conducted on these devices by multiple research groups in the biomedical and environmental fields due to their many advantages. Microrobots are very promising for biomedicine and can be used for facilitating easy diagnosis, rapid treatment, and speedy recovery from various diseases [1–10]. In addition, microrobots can reduce the invasiveness of treatments and surgeries compared to open surgery, radiation therapy, and manual interventions.

Although microrobots have shown potential for targeted drug delivery, most are non-degradable and raise biocompatibility concerns [11–14]. To address this problem, microrobots may be coated with a layer of gold (Au) or titanium oxide (TiO2) to improve their biocompatibility [15–19]. However, these layers are also non-degradable and can lead to chronic inflammatory reactions and accumulation in organs [20, 21]. Therefore, there is a need to develop degradable medical microrobots that can gradually degrade and metabolize a target substance without causing toxicity to surrounding tissues. Researchers have recently focused on developing degradable microrobots using polymers such as poly(lactic glycolic acid) (PLGA) [18, 22], polyethylene glycol (PEG) [23, 24], and gelatin methacryloyl (GELMA) [12]. However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved only PLGA for drug delivery applications [25, 26]. In vivo degradation of PLGA involves hydrolysis, which produces glycolic acid and lactic acid as degradation products. This may lead to an acidic environment and an inflammatory response around the target area [27, 28]. Polymeric degradable microrobots are generally incapable of self-propulsion and require non-degradable particles (SPION, Ni etc.) in their structure, powered by an external energy source for targeted delivery [12, 18]. Additionally, real-time observation of biopolymer-based microrobots using X-ray imaging is challenging due to their low density [29, 30]. Metal-based degradable micro-swimmers are a potential alternative due to their excellent biocompatibility, enhanced mechanical properties, and efficient self-propulsion [31, 32]. The movement of these tiny micro-swimmers relies on energy or power sources as the driving force for their locomotion. The specific energy sources (self-propulsion or external sources) depend on the design and materials of the micro-swimmer. In this regard, chemical swimmers are classified as motors because their speed and directionality cannot be controlled. By contrast, swimmers that can be controlled externally are considered robots [33–35]. Thanks to their remarkable locomotion capabilities, micromotors have a wide range of applications, including applications in biomedicine and environmental remediation.

The potential of micromotors to mitigate environmental pollution has attracted a great deal of interest in recent years [36–40]. Traditional remediation methods based on diffusion-based processes require external movement for effective waste treatment [37, 41, 42]. However, self-driving micromotors can efficiently interact with pollutants, thereby overcoming diffusion-limited reactions. These synthetic micro/nanomotors are a promising alternative for environmental remediation. Several research groups have demonstrated the efficacy of micromotors in removing pollutants from the environment using techniques such as the Fenton reaction, activated charcoal absorption, and oxidative detoxification in peroxide solutions [36, 37, 43–49]. However, the need for additional fuels to operate these micromotors can pose environmental and safety risks. To address these concerns, researchers are exploring a new class of microrobots that can harness energy from their surroundings, eliminating the need for additional fuel [31, 50].

Recent reviews on degradable metallic microrobots primarily focus on treating gastrointestinal (GI) tract diseases. However, the fuel-free propulsion and favorable biocompatibility of degradable metallic microrobots have led to multiple biomedical and environmental remediation researches in the past few years. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of recent advances in the development of metallic degradable microrobots for biomedical applications and environmental remediation. The discussion starts by exploring propulsion methods for microrobots, followed by a detailed examination of the characteristics, design principles, fabrication methods and degradation mechanism of degradable metallic microrobots. We also examine the multiple applications of these microrobots in biomedicine and environmental remediation. Finally, we conclude with an overview of the current challenges and future research directions for metallic degradable microrobots.

Propulsion of Micro/Nanorobots/Motors

First-generation drug carriers relied on passive diffusion and natural body fluid flow for drug delivery [51–53]. The propulsion of micro/nanorobots/motors in a liquid medium is a significant challenge and has been the subject of extensive research. Several active propulsion techniques have been developed that allow micro/nanorobots/motors to outperform the natural flow of body fluids and ultimately improve targeting efficiency in anatomically challenging body regions such as the brain, liver, and eye [5, 12, 16, 54, 55].

The motion of micro/nanoparticles (NPs) is mainly governed by viscous surface forces that dominate their inertial effect, necessitating the use of nonlinear motion mechanisms for successful propulsion at low Reynolds numbers in microscale environments [51–59]. In addition, their small size limits the power supply, making the drive even more demanding. Power for the microrobot can be classified as local (e.g., chemical and biohybrid designs), external (including magnetic, acoustic, light and electrical sources), or a combination of both.

Magnetic Propulsion

The magnetic propulsion of micro/nanorobots is promising due to its small-scale remote-control capability. Magnetically controlled micro/nanorobots can experience rotating magnetic torques or pulling magnetic forces using a permanent magnet or an electromagnetic coil. Typically, magnetic materials such as superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), nickel, iron [Fe], or cobalt are incorporated into the micro/nanorobot structure along with optimized magnetic fields to achieve the desired locomotion [60–65]. Various spiral magnetic microrobots inspired by the movement of Escherichia coli bacteria have been developed for drug delivery applications [23, 64, 66–70]. These microrobots spin around their main axis under a rotating magnetic field, generating a corkscrew motion that converts magnetic force into mechanical actuation of the microrobot (Fig. 1a–c) [17, 66, 70]. Consequently, helical microrobots containing magnetic particles can propel themselves by rotation or oscillation instead of being pulled by an external magnetic field. By contrast, magnetic walkers or drum-based micro-robots roll on a surface during propulsion and maintain constant interaction with the surface [71, 72]. However, successful clinical implementation of magnetically actuated microrobots is constrained by the need for specialized equipment (stereotaxis) and a limited workspace.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic representation of (a) magnetic actuation. Reproduced with permission [70].

Copyright 2013, Wiley Publication. (b) Helical hybrid magnetic microrobot. Reproduced with permission [67]. Copyright 2014, Wiley Publication. (c) Actuation of a helical hybrid microrobot under magnetic field. Reproduced with permission [67]. Copyright 2014, Wiley Publication. (d) Catalytic TiO2–Au Janus micromotor powered by UV light. Reproduced with permission [77]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (e) Trajectory of light-powered micromotors. Reproduced with permission [77]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (f) Light-responsive Janus B-TiO2/Au micromotor. Reproduced with permission [80]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. (g) Trajectory of an asymmetric metallic microrod by self-acoustophoresis. Reproduced with permission [86]. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society. (h) Bubble recoil propulsion of a metallic microtube under ultrasound. Reproduced with permission [87]. Copyright 2012, Wiley Publication

Light-Driven Propulsion

The use of light as a physical stimulus to facilitate the movement of micro/nanomotors is an established concept. Various materials have been developed that can convert energy from different regions of the electromagnetic spectrum into mechanical work. The response of a light-powered micro/nanomotor to light irradiation depends on its photoactivity. Such motors can be classified as photocatalytic, photothermal, photochromic, or photosensitive.

Photocatalytic materials have been studied for their advantages, such as efficient propulsion, fast response to light stimuli, and activation by a wide range of wavelengths [73–76]. Examples of photocatalytic materials are metal oxide semiconductors such as titania, silica, bismuth oxide, and oxometallates [77–81]. When these materials are activated by ultraviolet (UV), visible, or infrared radiation, the energy provided promotes an electron from the valence band to the conduction band. The result is an electro-photochemical reaction based on the wavelength of the incident light and the micro-/nanomotor material (Fig. 1d–f).

Photothermal materials such as carbon, silica, and polymers containing gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are also light-powered micro/nanomotors that convert light energy into thermal energy [82–85]. By inducing asymmetric preferential absorption of near-infrared (NIR) light, photothermal micro/nanomotors create a thermal gradient across the surface of the particle and the surrounding solution. These motors offer a high level of tunability and can operate over a wide range of the electromagnetic spectrum. However, the performance of current-generation micro/nanomotors is limited by the penetration of light in biological samples.

Acoustic Propulsion

Acoustic propulsion is a promising approach for externally powering micro/nanomotors due to its high tissue penetration, tunability, and biocompatibility. As sound waves propagate through a liquid medium, they generate a forward pressure that propels micro/nanomotors. Piezoelectric transducers are typically used to generate surface acoustic and ultrasonic propulsion sound waves. Ultrasonic propulsion has attracted much attention in micro/nanorobotics. The waves generated can be classified as standing, travelling, or focused ultrasound waves.

First-generation ultrasonic micro/nanomotors were powered using a self-acoustophoresis mechanism due to the shape asymmetry of the metallic nanowire (Fig. 1g) [86]. However, their movement was limited to the small area around the acoustic nodes. Micro/nanomotors also use acoustic travelling waves for actuation, where the travelling wave-induced vibration of the bubble enclosed in the micro/nanomotor structure enables its movement in the liquid medium. For example, Kagan et al. reported evaporative propulsion of tubular microrobots by high-intensity focused ultrasound [87] (Fig. 1h). The tubular micromotors receive a sudden impulse and reach a speed of 6.3 m s−1 due to rapid evaporation of the chemical fuel-perfluorocarbon emulsion.

Focused ultrasound is a safe, inexpensive, and effective method for delivering drug molecules to various tissues [88, 89]. However, successful development of ultrasonically controlled micro/nanomotors depends on the choice of materials. A high-density contrast between the constituent material of micro/nanomotors and surrounding fluid is necessary for strong propulsion [90]. For instance, micro/nanostructures in which gas microbubbles are embedded exhibit a high-density contrast with their surrounding medium, enabling strong propulsion upon application of an acoustic field [91, 92].

Chemical Propulsion

Chemical propulsion is a promising approach for localized actuation of micromotors. Micromotors can harness chemical energy from their environment via specific chemical reactions. Chemically active materials, such as noble metals (e.g., platinum [Pt], Au, and silver [Ag]), transient metals (e.g., Fe, zinc [Zn], and magnesium [Mg]), metal alloys, reactive materials (e.g., calcium carbonate), and bio-catalytic enzymes (e.g., urease, catalase, and glucose oxidase), have been used for this purpose [46, 56, 93–96]. By incorporating these materials into micro/nanostructures in combination with a green fuel, propulsion can be achieved.

Bimetallic nanowires of Au and Pt have been developed as early-stage catalytic engines and immersed in hydrogen peroxide fuel [97]. The electrocatalytic decomposition of the hydrogen peroxide fuel results in an asymmetric ion distribution around the bimetallic nanowire, generating an electrokinetic flow in the vicinity of the nanowire and leading to its movement (Fig. 2a). However, these catalytic micromotors require a hydrogen peroxide environment, which might limit their real-life applications. In addition, the thickness of the electrical double layer around the motor governs its velocity and is adversely affected at high salt concentrations [56, 98]. Chemically powered catalytic micro/nanomotors also have extremely low energy efficiencies in the order of 10−8–10−9.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic representation of (a) asymmetric catalytic propulsion of an Au-Pt micromotor. Reproduced with permission [97].

Copyright 2004, American Chemical Society. (b) Directional motion of a polymer-based bilayer microtube in 5% H2O2 solution. Reproduced with permission [102]. Copyright 2012, Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) Chemical propulsion of an Mg-based micromotor in an acidic environment. Reproduced with permission [144]. Copyright 2017, Springer Nature. (d) Chemical propulsion of a Zn-based micromotor in gastric acid. Reproduced with permission [223]. Copyright 2021, Wiley Publication. (e) Electric field induced propulsion of Janus particle under AC field. Reproduced with permission [110]. Copyright 2017, Wiley Publication. (f) Hybrid microrobot propelled by catalytic and magnetic propulsion. Reproduced with permission [113]. Copyright 2011, Wiley Publication

Another alternative approach to locally powered chemical propulsion is continuous bubble emission from micro/nanomotors. This mechanism generates greater velocity and power compared to self-electrophoresis and self-diffusiophoresis [99–101]. The catalytic surface of bubble-powered micro/nanomotors is encapsulated by inert materials such as silicon, perylene, polypyrrole, and graphene, leaving a small opening for the fuel to react with the motors [102–104]. It helps to achieve directional motion for the catalytic micro/nanomotors (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, micro/nanomotors based on Janus microspheres with a diverse range of openings, including half coating or nearly complete coating with a small hole, are also used for bubble propulsion (Fig. 2c–d). For instance, Mg was coated with an Au layer and a small opening was left in the microrobot [105]. When immersed in a physiological solution, hydrogen emission triggered propulsion due to macro-galvanic corrosion. The efficiency of micro/nanomotor propulsion depends on the frequency of bubble production, which is governed by the material, the surface roughness, and the geometric design of the micro/nanomotor. However, the use of toxic chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide, hydrazine, and sodium borohydride, as fuels for chemical propulsion hinders their biomedical application [106–109].

Electric Propulsion

An external electric field is also widely used for microrobot propulsion. An external electric field polarizes particles, which accumulate countercharges in the electric double layer (EDL) surrounding the particle [56, 110]. Subsequently, the applied field influences the induced charges to initiate electroosmotic flow. The more and less polarizable halves of Janus-type particles result in active propulsion under an alternating current (AC) field. Successful electric propulsion requires a combination of materials with distinct electric susceptibility. For example, metallic materials are considerably more strongly polarized than dielectric materials. When an electric field is applied, the metallic side experiences more polarization than the dielectric side [110]. Consequently, the microrobot propels itself with the dielectric side oriented forward due to the strong induced charge electro-osmosis (ICEO) around its metallic region [111]. The overall mechanism relies on generating asymmetric flow through the induced charges around the microrobot, as shown in Fig. 2e. When these microrobots are subjected to a uniform direct current (DC) field, they exhibit dipole behavior [112]. As a result, the charged end moves toward the opposite electrode through the contact charge electrophoresis (CCEP). In general, an AC electric field is applied to control the microrobot motion, as opposed to utilizing DC fields, thereby eliminating the electrophoresis effect.

Hybrid Propulsion

Local power-based microrobots are beneficial for carrying cargo and enhanced mixing. The direction of the microrobot is determined by itself and its environment. By contrast, externally powered microrobots offer tunable on-demand propulsion. To harness the advantages of both these techniques, the concept of a microrobot equipped with multiple engines is introduced. For example, a microrobot utilizing chemical and magnetic propulsion techniques has a catalytic head and flexible magnetic tail [113] (Fig. 2f). Initially, the microrobot moves solely via a chemical reaction. When the fuel is exhausted, an external magnetic field is applied to control its actuation, which is achieved by oscillating the flexible tail. A similar design was used to develop chemical/light and magneto-acoustic microrobots [114, 115]. For example, a magneto-acoustic microrobot had a helical structure coupled with a concave gold segment [115]. A microrobot with this type of twin power source has finely tunable propulsion. Furthermore, the hybrid propulsion technique may open-up new avenues of motion control with different modes (accelerating or braking) that a single engine could not achieve.

Biohybrid microrobots have recently been considered promising candidates for biomedical applications. These microrobots contain both biological and non-biological materials [116, 117]. For instance, magnetic particles have been embedded in microalgae (e.g., Spirulina, Chlorella, and diatoms) and some bacteria (e.g., E. coli and MTB) to develop such microrobots [118–122]. Biohybrid microrobots provide high flexibility and excellent driving force due to the presence of living tissues. The helical structures of magnetic microrobots enable efficient locomotion using cork-screw propulsion. Using Spirulina as a substrate, the bio-templated fabrication technique yields these helical structures, establishing it as the favored optimal approach [119]. Furthermore, different bodily cells (stem cells, red blood cells (RBC), and macrophages) have also been used to develop biohybrid magnetic microrobots due to their ability to transport therapeutic payloads and respond to biochemical signals [123]. Incorporating magnetic nanoparticles onto such biohybrid microrobots enables them to respond under an external magnetic field, facilitating precise navigation to hard-to-reach regions in the human body.

Metallic Biodegradable Micromotor

Early micro/nanorobots predominantly relied on non-degradable materials. After a treatment, these micro/nanorobots should be excreted from the body within a specific time-period. However, the natural excretion of microrobots depends on various parameters such as design, size, concentration of dosage, etc. For example, magnetic microrobots are widely used for targeted drug delivery purposes. Recent studies indicate that magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) larger than 100 nm can be excreted through the renal pathway within a limited time [124, 125]. If these particles are not completely excreted from the body, they may accumulate in the vital organs such as the liver, kidney or heart, and lead to chronic inflammatory responses. For instance, 55% of the intravenously injected oleic acid/pluronic-coated MNPs accumulated in the rat liver [126]. The accumulation of MNPs can potentially lead to oxidative stress, DNA damage, epigenetic events, and inflammatory processes [127–129]. Therefore, non-degradable microrobots may result in acute or chronic toxicity and require surgical intervention for removal [18, 130, 131]. In addition, retrieving these microrobots once their task is complete is challenging. Such non-degradable robots are typically rigid and hard, potentially leading to tissue injury and blood vessel rupture [132]. These challenges of non-degradable microrobots may significantly reduce their effectiveness.

Biodegradation is a time-dependent decomposition process facilitated by biological activities. It is a critical design parameter for microrobots, as these devices are expected to degrade into nontoxic metabolites after they have served their intended function. While synthetic polymers such as PEG, PLGA, and GELMA have been investigated extensively as degradable microrobots, their acidic degradation products have impeded their practical application [133, 134]. By contrast, the degradation products of natural polymers do not elicit a toxic response [135, 136], but their inferior processability typically allows the creation of large scaffolds by the mold-casting method [136, 137]. Therefore, a degradable microrobot needs a balance between degradability and mechanical strength. However, the majority of the materials used for microrobots display noncomplementary mechanical strength and degradation behaviors.

Trace elements such as Mg, Zn, and Fe, and their alloys, can be degraded in vivo via chemical reactions in physiological environments. The degradation products of these materials can easily be excreted without causing a toxic response [138, 139]. The three different metallic degradable micromotors are compared in Table 1. Moreover, these materials have enhanced mechanical properties and are degraded more rapidly than synthetic polymers. By contrast, catalytic non-degradable micromotors are typically employed for environmental remediation. However, these robots rely on toxic external fuel and decontamination reagents, leading to incomplete remediation and impeding their practical application. Therefore, self-propelled Janus-type noncatalytic metallic degradable micromotors may be an alternative approach to facilitate environmental remediation.

Table 1.

Comparison of different parameters, advantages and disadvantages of Mg/Zn/Fe micromotors

Mg based Zn based Fe based Daily intake (mg/day) 400 4–14 18 Degradation time Faster Moderate Low Actuation technique Chemical Chemical Magnetic Velocity Uncontrollable Uncontrollable Controllable Biocompatibility Excellent Moderate Low Advantages (i) High daily intake (i) Degradation rate is lower than Mg (i) Slow degradation (ii) Excellent biocompatibility (ii) Moderate biocompatibility (ii) Velocity can be controlled (iii) No external power source is required for propulsion (iii) No external power source is required for propulsion Disadvantages (i) Faster degradation rate (i) Lower daily intake (i) Low daily intake (ii) Uncontrollable motion (ii) Uncontrollable motion (ii) Low biocompatibility (iii) External source is required for motion control Potential applications Biomedical, environmental Biomedical Biomedical Refs. [31, 144, 171] [140, 223, 230] [141, 231]

Design Philosophy of Degradable Metallic Micromotors

The design of degradable metallic micromotors for biomedical applications requires careful consideration of material selection and fabrication techniques. In particular, the self-propelled devices have to perform their intended task, such as drug delivery or environmental remediation, and subsequently degrade naturally without causing any harm to the surrounding tissue or environment. Two categories of these micromotors/robots are spherical Janus particles and three-dimensional structures, such as helix [140, 141]. In particular, self-propelled Janus particles have demonstrated promising results as the most degradable metallic micromotors (Fig. 3a, b).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Schematic representation of (a) self-propelled Mg-ZnO micromotor. Reproduced with permission [140].

Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (b) Self-propulsion of Mg-ZnO micromotor under optical microscope. Reproduced with permission. [140]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (c) Schematic of an Mg/Au/Furosemide/polymer-coated micromotor. Reproduced with permission [146]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier. (d) Representative image of template-assisted fabrication of a Zn micromotor. Reproduced with permission [225]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society

To fabricate Janus particles, noble metal (Au/Pt/Ag) and drug layers are deposited onto spherical Mg particles. The formation of a passive Mg hydroxide layer upon exposure to water at ambient temperature prevents Janus-type Mg micromotors from using hydrogen bubble propulsion in water. However, these micromotors work efficiently in chloride-rich environments, such as body fluids or seawater, via macro-galvanic corrosion and chloride-pitting corrosion [31]. In such environments, Mg continuously reduces water, creating hydrogen bubbles for propulsion. The dissolution rate of Mg in chlorine-rich water depends on the electrochemical potential difference between Mg and the deposited metal. For instance, the standard electrode potentials of Ag and Au are + 0.80 and + 1.50 V, respectively, whereas Mg has a very low standard electrode potential of − 2.37 V. As a result, the difference in standard electrode potential for Au-Mg systems is higher, leading to considerably faster degradation of Mg compared to Ag-Mg systems. Therefore, the choice of deposited layer material can markedly affect the lifespan of Janus-type Mg-based micromotors.

One of the significant challenges in designing degradable metallic micromotors is their short lifespan, which may limit their ability to complete their task. Their degradation rate highly influences the performance of these micromotors. A faster degradation rate always hinders them from completing their assigned task. Upon exposure to the body fluid, these micromotors immediately react because of their high reactivity. As a result, early exposure to body fluid can compromise their performance. To address this limitation, micromotors may be encapsulated in a carrier or microcapsule that unloads them upon reaching the target area. For example, enteric gelatin capsules, lactose and maltose, PLGA etc. could be used as carrier or microcapsule [142, 143]. This strategy can prolong the lifespan of degradable metallic micromotors and increase their functional efficiency.

Fabrication of Metallic Degradable Micromotors

Fabricating metallic degradable micromotors is challenging due to their high reactivity in the atmosphere. Metallic degradable micromotors can be fabricated using two distinct methods: onion-like layer-by-layer deposition on a glass slide and electrochemical processes [140, 142]. In the following section, several fabrication techniques for developing degradable metallic micromotors are discussed.

Onion-Like Layer-by-Layer Deposition for Metallic Degradable Micromotors

Most of the literature on the fabrication of metal-based degradable micromotors has focused on onion-like layer-by-layer deposition on a glass slide because of its simplicity and low-cost involvement. The fabrication technique described in this section involves layer-by-layer deposition using powder particles and sputtering of noble metals (Au/Ag/Pt) or TiO2 onto their surface on a glass slide [144–146]. This fabrication technique generates a tiny opening in the particle-glass interface that enables the micromotor core to interact with the surrounding medium and achieve bubble propulsion [147]. After the deposition of the metal/ceramic oxide layer, a separate layer containing a drug molecule is deposited. Figure 3c shows drug-loaded Mg-based micromotors. Despite the successful development of degradable metallic micromotors using this fabrication technique, rapid degradation is a significant concern. Therefore, a degradable metallic micromotor carrier is proposed [142, 143]. It has an enteric coating that degrades upon reaching the target site, releasing the degradable metallic micromotors to perform their designated functions [143].

Electrochemical Processes

Electrochemical deposition is a versatile and cost-effective method for fabricating micro/nanostructures with controlled shapes [148]. This method is based on the reduction of metal ions from aqueous, organic, or ionic liquid electrolytes by an external electrical field, causing them to deposit onto conductive substrates. The kinetics and mechanisms of the electrochemical reaction at the metal-solution interface, as well as the nucleation and growth processes of the metal lattice, determine the size of the resulting micro/nanostructures [149].

A typical three-electrode deposition system consists of an electrochemical bath, two electrodes (working and counter electrodes), and one reference electrode. The electrochemical bath contains a solution of metallic ions to be deposited on the working electrode, where reduction mainly occurs, while oxidation typically takes place on the counter or reference electrode. Cathodic deposition of metal ions is preferred due to their positive charge, whereas anodic deposition is rarely employed due to its poor adhesion and stoichiometric composition.

Template-based fabrication is used for the electrodeposition of micromotors, where a negative replica of a rigid template is developed to produce exact shapes. This technique offers an easy way to fabricate complex micro/nanostructures such as nanowires, nanotubes, micro-helices, and porous nanocones (Fig. 3d). The electrodeposition method is simple, scalable, and versatile, making it a promising approach for various applications in nanotechnology and microengineering.

Degradation Mechanism of Metallic Degradable Micromotor

Degradable metallic micromotors such as Mg, Zn, and Fe are made from reactive metals. These materials react easily with water or acid, resulting in hydrogen bubble formation. In general, Janus-type degradable metallic micromotors are propelled by a chemical reaction that eventually leads to their degradation [31, 144]. The degradation of these micromotors is governed by macro-galvanic corrosion and the presence of anions in the medium [50, 146, 150].

Macro-galvanic corrosion is an electrochemical reaction between two dissimilar metals that are in electrical contact [151]. One of them acts as a cathode, and the other one acts as an anode due to the difference in standard electrode potential. A schematic of macro-galvanic corrosion is shown in Fig. 4a. Janus-type degradable metallic micromotors are designed to make a macro-galvanic electrochemical cell. For example, noble metals (Au/Pt) are deposited on the surface of degradable metals [50, 143, 152]. As a result, it forms a macro-galvanic cell in the presence of surrounding media. When dispersed in chloride ion rich water, these particles react with the medium to form a metal hydroxide on the surface. For example, a magnesium hydroxide layer rapidly forms on the Mg surface of Mg/Pt Janus particles exposed to blood plasma or human serum according to the following reaction [153]:

1 2 3

Body fluid is also rich in chloride ions [154, 155]. The degradation mechanism of degradable metallic micromotors is significantly influenced by this ion. Although the hydroxide layer is stable in water, chloride ions in the solution significantly accelerate macro-galvanic corrosion. For example, upon contact with blood plasma or human serum, the passive hydroxide layer reacts with chloride ions to produce highly soluble magnesium chloride (MgCl2) [50]:

4 5

In general, pitting corrosion happens in metals with a protective passive oxide layer [50, 156, 157]. Aggressive anions like chloride can easily penetrate the passive layer and enable their electrostatic transport within the pit. Furthermore, the charge balance in the corrosion pits is maintained by an increase in the Mg2+ ion concentration. As corrosion progresses, the pit surface experiences OH depletion, which hinders its passivation. The pit environment becomes mildly acidic because of the accumulation of Mg2+ and Cl− ions, further promoting the degradation of Mg. Therefore, the synergistic effect of macro-galvanic and pitting corrosion enhances the dissolution of degradable micromotors and propulsion. The degradation mechanism is shown schematically in Fig. 4b.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

(a) Schematic of macro-galvanic corrosion. (b) Degradation mechanism of a degradable metallic microrobot in chloride ion-rich medium. (I) Microrobot just after exposure to medium, (II) passive layer formation on the surface, (III) aggressive anion (chloride)-induced pitting corrosion

The corrosion of pure Zn progresses through the anodic dissolution of Zn, while oxygen reduction occurs as the dominant cathodic reduction during the initial immersion period according to Eqs. (6) and (7). As the reaction proceeds with time, increases in the Zn2+ and OH− concentrations lead to the precipitation of zinc hydroxide (Zn(OH)2). Zn(OH)2 changes into more thermodynamically stable zinc oxide (ZnO), forming a protective layer on the metal surface to prevent further corrosion. Aggressive anions like Cl− can react with these corrosion products and convert into soluble zinc chloride (ZnCl2) [158, 159]. Consequently, the protective layer becomes damaged, leading to rapid degradation.

6 7 8 9 10

Zn-based micromotors are also designed as Janus-type particles. Therefore, their degradation is also governed by macro-galvanic corrosion. Most of the Zn-based micromotors were developed for gastrointestinal (GI) tract treatments. For example, the Zn/Fe Janus micromotor was exposed to simulated gastric acid (pH 1.1). The respective anodic indices of Fe and Zn are − 0.75 and − 1.25 V [140]. As a result, it forms a short-circuited galvanic cell when in contact with gastric acid. The Zn core reacts with an acidic solution and releases H2 bubble to initiate micromotor propulsion according to the following equation [140]:

11

Pure Fe is the most noble of the three biodegradable metals, and its standard electrode potential is − 0.44 V (vs. SHE) [160]. Therefore, it has a slow degradation rate compared to Mg and Zn. The degradation mechanism consists of the anodic dissolution of Fe and cathodic reduction of dissolved oxygen, as shown in Eqs. 12 and 13 [160]. The reaction between the released metal ions and hydroxyl ions leads to the formation of ferrous hydroxide (Fe(OH)2) or hydrous ferrous oxide (FeO·nH2O). At the outer surface of the hydroxide layer, ferrous (Fe2+) oxides are converted into ferric oxide (Fe3+) or ferric hydroxide in the presence of dissolved oxygen [161]. Hydrous ferric oxide is brown and the most visible corrosion product. The corrosion products are generally porous and do not cover metal surfaces homogeneously. Hence, Cl− ions diffuse toward the metal surface, lowering the (Fe2+) ion concentration and forming ferrous chloride (FeCl2). FeCl2 is further hydrolyzed by water, generating acid according to Eq. 16 and resulting in localized corrosion [162].

12 13 14 15 16

The degradation of Janus-type Mg and Zn-based micromotors is governed by macro-galvanic corrosion. This phenomenon strongly depends on the difference between the standard electrode potential (E0) of the core and that of the deposited noble metal layer. The standard electrode potentials of Mg and Zn are − 2.37 and − 0.76 V, respectively. If a noble metal (Ag, E0 =  + 0.8 V) is deposited on both Mg and Zn particles, the degradation rate of the Mg-based micromotor would be higher than that of the Zn-based micromotor due to the large difference in standard electrode potential. Therefore, Zn-based Janus-type micromotors have a longer lifespan than Mg-based micromotors for the same noble metal deposition. In comparison, Fe-based microrobots were fabricated with a 3D helical/roller structure. These degraded slowly in gastric acid fluid, compared to Mg and Zn-based micromotors, because of their higher standard electrode potential.

Magnesium-Based Micromotors

Mg is an abundant element, ranking eighth in the Earth's crust [163]. As a group II element, it is highly reactive and quickly reacts with water at ambient temperature. In its pure form, Mg does not exhibit desirable mechanical properties compared to other engineering metals, limiting its structural applications. However, Mg shows favorable biocompatibility and degradation in physiological solutions. For instance, Mg alloy-based cardiovascular stents are more advantageous than those of Ti alloy or stainless steel due to their low thrombogenicity, biocompatibility, and degradability [164–166]. Additionally, Mg alloy-based implants, such as bone plates and screws, promote the formation of new bone growth by stimulating osteoblast activity [167–169].

In the body, Mg is the fourth most abundant cation [170–172] with a daily requirement of 400 mg/day [173, 174]. It acts as a cofactor for around 300 enzymes and participates in several metabolic processes [175, 176]. Mg-rich water may reduce the incidence of cardiovascular diseases [177]. The Mg concentration in extracellular fluid ranges from 0.7 to 1.05 mmol L−1, and its homeostasis is maintained by the kidneys and intestine [178]. Hyper-magnesium, which can cause muscular paralysis, respiratory distress, and cardiac arrest, occurs when the Mg concentration exceeds 1.05 mmol L−1. However, hyper-magnesium is rare due to the efficient excretion of Mg in urine. Conversely, Mg deficiency leads to congestive heart failure, osteoporosis, fibromyalgia, and other diseases [179, 180]. Thus, Mg is suitable for micromotors because of its biochemical and biological advantages.

Biomedical Applications

Gastrointestinal Tract

Oral drug delivery is a convenient method of drug administration due to its non-invasiveness, cost-effectiveness, and high patient compliance. However, it has limitations, such as enzymatic degradation causing the first-pass effect, poor permeability, wide pH variations in the GI tract, and continuous mucus secretion [181]. The GI tract shows marked pH variation, with gastric acid being highly acidic (pH 1–3) and the intestine mildly acidic (pH 6–7). Conventional micro/nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems do not function efficiently in this acidic environment due to a short intestinal retention time, leading to inadequate drug absorption [182, 183]. Therefore, researchers have aimed to develop enzyme-assisted and diffusion-based drug delivery systems [184, 185]. However, these systems have low precision, size restrictions, and specific surface chemistries.

In contrast, in an acidic environment, Janus-type metallic micromotors such as Mg are propelled by the bubble recoil mechanism, regardless of pH [186]. Helicobacter pylori (H-pylori) causes stomach infections and other gastric diseases [187, 188]. Antibiotics combined with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the conventional treatment for H-pylori infections [189, 190]. However, long-term use of PPIs can lead to various side effects such as headaches, anxiety, depression, and diarrhea [191–194].

As an alternative approach, Avila et al. fabricated Mg-based micromotors loaded with the antibiotic, clarithromycin (CLR) [144]. The Mg microsphere was asymmetrically coated with a thin, uniform layer of TiO2 and then coated layer-by-layer with drug-loaded PLGA and chitosan (Fig. 5a). The micromotors attached to the mucosal layer of the stomach wall by their outer chitosan layer. The drug-loaded Mg micromotors had an average speed and lifetime of 120 µm s−1 and 6 min, respectively, in simulated gastric fluid (pH 1.3). The lifetime could be tuned by controlling the size of the opening. Efficient propulsion of CLR-loaded Mg micromotors is required to attach to the stomach wall and achieve a therapeutic effect. Furthermore, the continuous degradation of Mg reduces the concentration of H+ ions in gastric fluid and neutralizes its pH. In vivo mouse studies showed that CLR-loaded Mg-based micromotors had better retention and interactions with stomach tissue (Fig. 5b). This significantly reduced bacterial infection compared to passive drug delivery.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Schematic of (a) Mg-TiO2-drug@PLGA-chitosan micromotor. Reproduced with permission [144].

Copyright 2017, Springer Nature. (b) Bright-field and fluorescence images of the luminal lining of the mouse stomach: (I) control, (II) Mg micromotor after 30 min and (III) 2 h of oral administration. Reproduced with permission [144]. Copyright 2017, Springer Nature. (c) PACT-controlled drug-loaded microcapsule. Reproduced with permission [143]. Copyright 2019, The American Association for the Advancement of Science. (d) Fabrication of EMgMs. Reproduced with permission [195]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (e) ICP analysis of micromotors retention in the GI tract: (I) bare Mg, EMgMs with (II) thin, (III) medium and (IV) thick polymer coating. Reproduced with permission [195]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (f) Fluorescence images of mouse GI tract (I) control, (II) EMgMs coated with medium polymer and loaded with rhodamine 6G, and (III) silica motor control after 6 h of oral administration. Reproduced with permission [195]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (g) Schematic of a microrobot pill containing an Mg/TiO2/PLGA micromotor in a lactose/maltose pill matrix. Reproduced with permission [142]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. (h) Bright-field fluorescence image (DiD dye loaded microrobot) of the luminal lining of the mouse stomach: (I) naïve, (II) silica pill (III) free Mg micromotor, and (IV) Mg micromotor pill at 4 h after oral administration. Reproduced with permission [142]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. (i) Mg/TiO2/RBC-toxin/chitosan/enteric-coated motor toxoid. Reproduced with permission [196]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (j) Representative image of the mouse GI tract: (I) static micromotor (DiD labeled) and (II) motor toxoids at 6 h after oral gavage. (H, high fluorescence; L, low fluorescence). Reproduced with permission [196]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society

Although chemically propelled Mg micromotors show promise for the treatment of GI tract diseases due to their bubble recoil-based autonomous propulsion, imaging and precise control of these micromotors for sustainable drug release remain challenges to be overcome. To this end, Wu et al. developed a photoacoustic computed tomography (PACT) guided Mg-based micromotors that exhibited controlled propulsion and long-term in vivo retention [143]. Micromotor capsules (MCs) were fabricated in two steps. In the first step, spherical Mg particles were coated with Au, an alginate-drug solution, and a perylene layer as a shell scaffold. Next, complete encapsulation of the fabricated micromotors was performed using enteric gelatin (Fig. 5c). The Au layer enhanced optical absorption for PACT imaging and efficient propulsion due to galvanic corrosion. The MCs were administered to mice orally with water and evaluated by PACT imaging after anesthesia. Non-invasive PACT imaging enabled real-time monitoring of the micromotors in deep tissue (7 cm) with high resolution. Furthermore, continuous-wave near-infrared (CW-NIR) irradiation at the target site led to a phase change in the capsule material, which triggered the micromotor’s chemical propulsion. As a result, the micromotors adhered to the intestine walls, thereby prolonging their retention.

Wang et al. developed an enteric-coated Mg-based micromotor that exhibited potential for the treatment of GI tract-related bacterial diseases [195]. The enteric coating preserved the integrity of the micromotors in an acidic medium while being degraded in intestinal fluid (pH 6–7), leading to efficient propulsion. To accomplish this, researchers loaded Mg particles into an enteric-coated PEDOT/Au microtube (Fig. 5d). Due to the chemical reaction between the Mg particles and the intestinal fluid, the micromotors achieved an average speed of 60 µm s−1. Controlling the thickness of the enteric coating enabled selective positioning and activation of the micromotor in the GI tract. Micromotors with a thick polymer coating (1.2 µm) had an activation time of 2 h in intestinal fluid, indicating that the micromotors selectively reached the lower GI tract. An in vivo mouse model indicated that the distribution and retention of enteric-coated Mg micromotors (EMgMs) in the GI tract largely depended on the thickness of the enteric coating (Fig. 5e). Furthermore, EMgMs coated with a medium polymer exhibited higher fluorescence intensity than silica microsphere-loaded PEDOT/Au microtubes, which could be attributed to the enhanced retention of EMgMs in the GI tract as a result of propulsion and collision with the porous slimy mucus layer (Fig. 5f).

In a separate study, Wang et al. fabricated a swallowable Mg micromotor pill and evaluated its in vivo response in a gastric environment [142]. Asymmetric Janus Mg micromotors coated with TiO2 and PLGA were embedded in a pill matrix of inactive excipients (lactose/maltose) (Fig. 5g). The dissolution of the pill matrix in gastric fluid led to the release of Mg micromotors, which were autonomously propelled by the hydrogen bubble recoil mechanism until they were completely dissolved. Pill matrix dissolution was size and temperature dependent, with larger pills (5 × 3 mm2) dissolving more rapidly at 37 °C (6 min) than at 22 °C (8 min). Also, the excipient matrix did not impact the propulsion behavior of the released Mg micromotors. To understand the in vivo retention of the micromotors in stomach tissue, the researchers used fluorescently labelled (DiD) micromotors. The results showed that pills with Mg/TiO2/PLGA@DiD/chitosan micromotors had a higher fluorescence intensity than free micromotors (Fig. 5h).

The efficacy of orally administrated vaccines needs to be enhanced [196]. To this end, Wang’s group has developed Mg-based biomimetic micromotors for oral vaccine delivery. Using the cell membrane-coating technique, they immobilized and neutralized model bacterial toxins on the surface of micromotors. The Mg microspheres were asymmetrically coated layer-by-layer with TiO2, toxin (staphylococcal α-toxin) embedded in a red blood cell (RBC) membrane and mucoadhesive chitosan, and encapsulated with a pH-responsive enteric polymer coating for selective activation in the GI tract (Fig. 5i). In simulated gastric fluid, bare Mg/TiO2 and motor toxoids displayed almost identical propulsion speeds (200 µm s−1). However, for motor toxoids, a speed reduction (24%) was observed in intestinal fluid at neutral pH due to the integrity of the membrane and chitosan layer, which might hinder fuel access to the motor core. A favorable cell-motor interaction was observed for motor toxoids compared to static micromotors, as evidenced by the significant increase in membrane fragment uptake. Overall, the enteric-coated motor toxoid exhibited no cytotoxicity up to 2 mg/mL. In vivo studies also indicated enhanced retention of motor toxoids and an enhanced immune response against α-toxins in orally vaccinated mice (Fig. 5j).

Chen et al. reported self-destroyed transient material-based biocompatible micromotors for the treatment of GI tract diseases [140]. Mg/ZnO Janus micromotors exhibited complete degradation after 18 min in 0.5 M NaHCO3. Although the entire Mg core did not degrade, Mg/ZnO micromotors were observed to move at a velocity of 24.7 µm s−1 for only 1 min, possibly because of their less reactive surface area, which hampers bubble nucleation and growth. The authors also designed Mg/Si Janus micromotors that showed complete degradation in 5 h. The prolonged degradation time of the outer Si shell could be useful for drug delivery platforms, bioimaging, or biosensing.

Maric et al. developed a self-propelled pH-responsive Mg micromotor for drug delivery in the GI tract [146]. Mg/Au Janus micromotors were fabricated and loaded with the drug furosemide, and a pH-responsive enteric coating was applied to protect the drug. Drug- and polymer-coated Janus Mg micromotors showed significantly enhanced lifetimes and velocities compared to bare Mg/Au micromotors (Table 2). The motion of the majority of the micromotors was linear, suggesting that hydrodynamic drag and the propulsion force were in the same direction. In vitro drug-release studies indicated that the micromotor fully released the drug within 3 min.

Table 2.

Process and performance parameters of a magnesium-based micromotors for biomedical applications

Sl. no Composition Particle size (µm) Deposition parameters Velocity (µm/s) Carrier Drug used Actuation method Average life time (s) Immersion medium In vivo model Refs GI tract applications 1 Mg/TiO2/Drug@PLGA/chitosan 20 ± 5 TiO2 deposition using ALD at 100 °C for 120 cycles Vavg = 120 None CLR Chemical 180 0.1 N HCl Male mice [144] 2 Mg/Au/drug@alginate/parylene C 20 ± 5 Au deposition (100 nm) through E-beam evaporator Vavg = 45 (PBS) Vavg = 43 (intestinal fluid) Enteric-coated microcapsule DOX NIR-activated propulsion. PACT used for real time imaging – PBS/intestinal fluid Nude mice [143] 3 PEDOT/Au microtube loaded with Mg particles 5 Electroplating technique Vavg = 60 Enteric-coated microtube – Chemical 60 Gastric/intestinal fluid Male mice [195] 4 Mg/TiO2/cargo@PLGA 20 ± 5 TiO2 deposition using ALD at 100° C for 3,000 cycles ˜260 (22° C) ˜300 (37° C) Lactose (60%)/maltose (40%) pill Chemical 300 (Pill dissolution time) Simulated gastric fluid Male CD-1 mice [142] 5 Mg/TiO2/RBC-toxin/chitosan 20 ± 5 TiO2 deposition using ALD at 100 °C for 3,000 cycles 200 (gastric fluid) 152 (intestinal fluid) Enteric coating Staphylococcal α-toxin Chemical – Gastric/intestinal fluid Male CD-1 mice [196] 6 Mg/ZnO 30 ZnO shell thickness 100 nm 24.7 – – Chemical 60 0.5 M NaHCO3 – [140] 7 Mg/Au/drug/Eudragit® L100 20 ± 5 Au shell thickness 40 nm 46.5 – Furosemide Chemical 250 3 M NaCl and 0.5 wt% Triton X-100 – [146] ROS scavenging 1 Mg/drug@PLGA 25 – 57 ± 19 – DOX Chemical 270 SBF – [147] 2 Mg/HA hydrogel/PLGA 16 Thickness of hydrogel and PLGA 2.5 µm 40.1 (SSF) 45.5 (PBS) – Hyaluronic Acid Chemical Simulated synovial fluid/PBS CIA Rats [208] 3 Mg@mesoporous Silica 20 SiO2 shell thickness 100 nm – – – Chemical 22 h SBF – [209] Imaging and other applications 1 Mg-Ni 25 Ni layer 100 nm 301.7 (at 10 Hz and 24 µm particle size) – – Chemical + magnetic 76 aqueous solution containing HCO3−, H+ and Cl− – [212] 2 Mg/TiO2/PLL/MΦ 20–25/10–15 TiO2 deposition using ALD at 100° C for 3,000 cycles 190.5 ± 13.24/62.8 ± 4.3 – – Chemical 300 Simulated gastric fluid – [215] 3 Mg/AuNP@alginate/RBC 20 ± 5 Incubation with chitosan-stabilized Au, ALG and RBC separately 172 Chemical  > 2 0.08 M NaCl s – [214] Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging

Excessive generation of hydroxyl radical (·OH), a cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS), in mitochondria can lead to oxidative stress. Major diseases, including cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer, and Parkinson disease, are associated with elevated levels of ROS in tissues [197–201]. Minimizing the ROS levels in cancerous cells leads to apoptosis, making ROS scavenging a potential therapeutic strategy for diseases related to elevated ROS levels.

Hydrogen is a potent antioxidant with therapeutic potential. Hydrogen therapy scavenges ROS from tumor cells and inhibits their growth [202, 203]. Hydrogen can also balance cellular redox homeostasis and selectively reduce toxic oxidative radicals, such as hydroxyl radicals. In addition, hydrogen activates endogenous antioxidant enzymes and downregulates proinflammatory cytokines [202, 203]. However, the therapeutic potential of hydrogen is limited by its low solubility in physiological solutions (0.8 mM) [204]. Therefore, hydrogen carriers—such as palladium hydride (PdH0.2) nanocrystals, magnesium bromide (MgB2) nanosheets, and iron nanoparticles (Fe NPs)—have been developed to enhance therapeutic efficacy and enable targeted and controlled delivery of molecular hydrogen [205, 206]. However, the above approaches use non-degradable porous micro- or nanoparticles, which have limited loading capacity and tissue penetration, and toxicity concerns.

Magnesium-based Janus micromotors were developed for long-term hydrogen therapy. Liu et al. synthesized doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded PLGA-coated, Mg-based micromotors for synergistic hydrogen chemotherapy (Fig. 6a) [147]. The micromotor exhibited an average speed of 57 ± 19 μm s−1 with a lifetime of 4.5 min. The Janus-type Mg micromotor group showed a 12-fold increase in ROS scavenging efficacy compared to the non-micromotor group due hydrogen-mediated disruption of redox homeostasis.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Schematic representation of (a) Mg-PLGA-DOX micromotor. Reproduced with permission [147].

Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (b) Mg-HA-PLGA micromotor. Reproduced with permission [208]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. (c) Mesoporous SiO2-coated Mg micromotor. Reproduced with permission [209]. Copyright 2018, Wiley Publication. (d)–(i) Representative micro-CT analysis of rat ankle joint after 29 days of treatment. Reproduced with permission [208]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease that causes bone and cartilage destruction. The degradation of hyaluronic acid in the synovial joints is closely related to cartilage damage [207]. Although the cause of RA is unclear, excessive ROS production is associated with its development. Xu et al. developed Mg-based micromotors as hydrogen generators to reduce the ROS level in RA patients (Fig. 6b) [208]. The asymmetrically coated Mg-hyaluronic acid (HA) micromotor was deposited with biodegradable PLGA for the controlled release of hydrogen. The coating of HA and PLGA did not affect the motion of the Mg-based micromotors but prolonged their lifetime to approximately 5 min. Active motion of micromotors could be detected by ultrasound imaging using the hydrogen bubble due to the acoustic impedance difference. The prepared microparticles did not show any toxic response, even at a higher concentration (2 mg mL−1). Furthermore, the in vitro response of the micromotors reduced the overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6), which is considered to benefit RA. In a rat model of collagen-induced arthritis, disease progression was reduced by the synergistic effect of hydrogen gas delivery and HA (Fig. 6d–i).

Kong et al. synthesized core–shell type Mg with mesoporous SiO2 for hydrogen therapy (Fig. 6c) [209]. In this design, the porous structure of the mesoporous silica shell allows the physiological solution to react with the Mg core. The controlled generation and release of hydrogen were achieved by the barrier effect of the mesoporous silica shell, and the lifetime of the Mg micromotor was positively correlated with the thickness of the mesoporous silica layer due to an increase in the diffusion path of the reactant. A mesoporous SiO2 shell upon bare Mg enhanced cell protection threefold compared to bare Mg.

Imaging and Other Applications

Ultrasound imaging is low cost, non-invasive, allows real-time monitoring, and does not require radiation exposure. Typically, microbubbles are employed as contrast agents to improve acoustic contrast in target tissues and surrounding areas [210, 211]. However, the complex manufacturing and storage of microbubbles can limit image quality. To address this issue, Feng et al. developed Janus-type Mg/Ni micromotors that react with body fluids, releasing microbubbles as an ultrasound contrast agent to obtain high-quality images [212]. The micromotor velocity increased with ion concentration because of a higher rate of passivation layer removal of Mg(OH)2. Magnetic navigation enabled micromotors to move from neutral to acidic pH regions due to the presence of Ni in their structure. Under acidic conditions, the micromotor generated a large number of bubbles, which enabled precise imaging of the cavity organ. Targeted lesion imaging was achieved by combining ultrasound and a magnetic field. The echogenicity between the target tissue and microbubbles generated from Mg/Ni micromotors provided a clear ultrasound image. In vitro biocompatibility analysis using the tetrazolium-based colorimetric 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay did not reveal a cytotoxic response to the micromotors.

Zhou et al. investigated the photothermal and anti-tumor effects of biodegradable Mg/PLGA micro- and nanorobots [213]. Spherical micro- and nanomotors were developed by microfluidic fabrication, and their efficacy for photothermal therapy was evaluated. The performance of photothermal therapy depended on the Mg content, not carrier (PLGA) thickness. In vivo tumor models demonstrated remarkable tumor shrinkage in animals treated with Mg/PLGA microspheres under NIR light.

A cell-mimicking water-powered Mg-based Janus micromotor asymmetrically coated with RBCs, Au NPs, and alginate was developed [214]. The RBC-coated micromotors efficiently attracted, captured, and neutralized toxins in biological fluids. RBC-Mg micromotors efficiently cleaned α-toxin-containing biological solutions due to their propulsion. The addition of negatively charged iron oxide NPs to the micromotor structure enhanced control of their movement.

Wang et al. reported Mg micromotors with living macrophages (MΦ) in their extreme outer layers [215]. Initially, the particles were coated with a TiO2 and poly (L-lysine) (PLL) layer, to which MΦ attached via electrostatic interactions. The cell membrane of gram-negative bacteria releases lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is responsible for sepsis. MΦ can bind to LPS and remove it from the body. The MΦ-Mg micromotor removed LPS (66.82 ± 6.31%) more efficiently than free MΦ (53.34 ± 4.48%). Bubble propulsion resulted in the rapid movement (127.3 µm s−1) of MΦ-Mg micromotors, enabling them to bind more LPS Mg-based micromotors for biomedical applications (summarized in Table 2).

Xiong et al. first proposed a stimuli-induced “hovering” strategy for self-propelled Mg micromotors with motion responsive to both environmental temperature and H2O2 concentration [216]. The noble metal Platinum (Pt) and temperature-sensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) were deposited asymmetrically on Mg micromotor in sequence. The Mg-based micromotor showed hydrogen bubble propulsion in an aqueous solution of NaHCO3 and poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) due to a self-consuming Mg-H2O reaction. The propulsion mechanism transformed from the self-consuming Mg-H2O reaction to Pt-catalyzed H2O2 decomposition because of the presence of H2O2 in the surrounding environment. The change in the propulsion mechanisms would extend lifetime of the micromotor. Furthermore, the solution temperature also plays an important role in achieving different propulsion mechanisms. PNIPAM hydrogel has a large diffusion constant within the solution, below its lower critical solution temperature (LCST/32 °C). Consequently, the PNIPAM layer readily allows the H2O2 aqueous solution to permeate, initiating a reaction with Pt. This reaction triggers temperature-induced hovering motion due to the formation of oxygen (O2) bubbles on both sides. The velocity of Mg micromotors increased from 14.3 to 28.7 μm s−1 during their transition from an aqueous NaHCO3 solution to a 0.1 wt% H2O2 solution at 38 °C. The enhanced velocity could be attributed to the higher production of O2 bubbles, which stems from both the higher rate constant of Pt-catalyzed H2O2 decomposition and the lower critical nucleation concentration of O2.

Kong et al. developed Mg/Pt Janus micromotor to sense glucose level in human serum without any additional toxic fuels or surfactants [153]. The sensing device is a screen printed with a three-electrode system in which the working electrode was modified with glucose oxidase (GOx) and glutaraldehyde (GTA). The system follows the principle of second-generation glucose biosensor. In this system, ferrocenemethanol (FcMeOH) enhances the heterogeneous electron transfer process when glucose is broken down enzymatically by GOx. The electrochemical conversion of FcMeOH into Fc+ MeOH indicates the glucose concentration within the solution, while generating an electric signal. The developed Mg/Pt micromotor exhibited fast motion and vigorous bubbling in the solution, leading to an increased flow of molecules and ions. Consequently, the oxidation of glucose and FcMeOH on the electrode surface elevated the detection sensitivity. The presence of glucose in the solution had no impact on the average velocity and lifetime of the micromotor. The enhanced signal current for glucose in human serum when using Mg/Pt Janus micromotors could be attributed to the improved mass transfer within the solution due to the rapid motion of the micromotors. Furthermore, the chronoamperometric data corroborated the significant role of Mg/Pt micromotors in enhancing the current response at millimolar glucose concentration.

Environmental Applications

Conventional water treatment methods typically rely on oxidizing agents, which can generate harmful by-products that pose health risks. Researchers have developed Mg-based micromotors as a promising, environmentally friendly technology capable of removing environmental pollutants by enhanced localized fluid mixing. The two primary mechanisms contributing to this enhanced mixing are microbubble generation and fluid flow induced by motion. Mg-based Janus micromotors do not need fuel and produce no harmful chemicals during clean-up. Therefore, researchers have sought to incorporate various functional groups or reactive surfaces onto Mg Janus micromotors to enhance their potential for environmental remediation.

Chitosan has broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against various bacteria and fungi [217–219]. The electrostatic interaction between chitosan and the cell membrane is responsible for its antibacterial properties. Delezuk et al. developed self-propelled Mg/Au/PLGA/Alg/chitosan-coated micromotors that could swim through bacteria-contaminated water [220]. The outer chitosan layer mechanically damages bacterial cells upon contact, resulting in highly efficient bacterial killing (Fig. 7a). Macro-galvanic corrosion between the Mg and Au layers is responsible for the highly efficient bubble propulsion of the Mg-chitosan micromotors. Notably, the Mg-Chitosan micromotor demonstrated a bacterial killing efficiency of > 96% in drinking water within 10 min due to its efficient propulsion and chitosan’s antibacterial properties (Fig. 7d). This antibacterial micromotor showed a bacterial killing efficiency of > 90% in seawater and freshwater.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

(a) (I) Structure of Mg/Au/PLGA/Alg/Chi micromotors, (II) water-powered Mg/Au/PLGA/Alg/Chi micromotor approaching bacteria, (III) contact between micromotor and E. coli, (IV) micromotor killing bacteria. Reproduced with permission [220].

Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) Self-propulsion and photocatalytic degradation of biological and chemical warfare agents by a chemically propelled TiO2/Au/Mg micromotor. Reproduced with permission [96]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society. (c) Possible mechanism of the bactericidal activity of the water-propelled, AgNP-coated Janus micromotor. Reproduced with permission [150]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. Statistical plot of E. coli killing by (d) Mg/Au/PLGA/Alg/Chi. Reproduced with permission [220], Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry. Spore destruction efficiency of (e) TiO2/Au/Mg. Reproduced with permission [96]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society. (f) Percentage of dead E. coli in contact with 0.5 mg Mg, Janus microparticles (JPs), cysteamine-modified JPs (JP-cyt), and AgNP-coated microrobots at pH 6. Reproduced with permission [150]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. (g) Mg/Au Janus micromotor-based strategy for the simultaneous degradation/detection of DPP. Reproduced with permission [221]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (h) Mechanism of detection of organophosphorus nerve agents by Mg micromotors. Reproduced with permission [222]. Copyright 2015, Royal Society of Chemistry. (i) Seawater-driven magnetically guided alkanethiol-modified Mg micromotor for environmental oil remediation. Reproduced with permission [50]. Copyright 2013, Royal Society of Chemistry

The photocatalytic decomposition of chemical and biological warfare agents (CBWAs) using self-propelled TiO2-coated Mg micromotors is a promising new strategy (Fig. 7b) [96]. TiO2/Au/Mg micromotors can rapidly and completely remove CBWAs without the need for external fuel. During the autonomous propulsion of the micromotors in the water, UV activation generates strong oxidative species on the TiO2 surface. Remarkably, a small quantity of micromotors (2.25 mg) degraded the nerve agent stimulant methyl paraoxon by > 90% within 10 min. Furthermore, bubble-propelled Mg/Au/TiO2 micromotors significantly reduced (86%) Bacillus anthracis spores compared to TiO2 and Al2O3 (Fig. 7e). The combination of autonomous propulsion and surface photocatalytic reaction accounts for the high efficiency of these micromotors in removing CBWAs from water.

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) were added to magnetically guided Mg micromotors for bacterial killing in a contaminated aqueous medium [150]. Mg particles were coated with Fe and Au layers by the electron beam metal evaporation method, and AgNPs were attached to the Au surface (Fig. 7c). The enhanced bacterial killing of the Mg micromotors was attributable to their autonomous propulsion, which promoted direct contact between AgNPs and bacteria, leading to selective transportation of Ag2+ into the cytoplasm. Most bacteria adhering to AgNP-embedded Mg/Fe/Au particles were dead. The Au layer on the Mg micromotor captured and killed the bacteria. The AgNP-loaded Mg/Fe/Au micromotor removed > 80% of bacteria from contaminated water within 15 min (Fig. 7f). The magnetic properties of the Fe layer were used to collect the micromotors together with the captured dead bacteria by magnetic guidance.

Diphenyl phthalate (DPP) is a harmful plasticizer commonly found in food packaging and serves as an indirect food additive. Rojas et al. demonstrated that Mg-based Janus-type micromotors could be used in food quality control applications [221]. Mg/Au Janus particles were used to detect DPP in food products without the use of expensive equipment (Fig. 7g). Mg/Au micromotors released hydrogen bubbles, which provided autonomous motion and enhanced mixing. Additionally, they released hydroxyl ions, which converted non-electro-active DPP into electro-active phenol, resulting in an increased analytical signal by differential pulse voltammetry (DPV).

Cinti et al. reported strip-based electrochemical measurement using Mg micromotors for the rapid degradation and detection of organophosphorus (OPH) nerve agents without the need for external devices (Fig. 7h) [222]. Degradation of Mg/Ni/Au microparticles increased the medium pH, accelerating the conversion of non-detectable paraoxon to detectable p-nitrophenol. The microbubbles generated by the micromotors promoted rapid electrochemical reactions and enhanced mixing. Also, the magnetic anchoring of the micromotors was used to restrict their movement toward the electrode area to avoid interference with the reaction. The strip-based paraoxon assay exhibited 15-fold higher sensitivity than non-engineered bare screen-printed electrodes.

Gao et al. reported ecofriendly degradable Mg micromotors with nickel-Au bilayer patches propelled by seawater (Fig. 7i) [50]. The bilayer patch integrated into the micromotor structure enabled its magnetic guidance by surface modification. The micromotors showed autonomous propulsion in seawater due to macro-galvanic corrosion and chloride pitting corrosion, with the velocity depending on the ion concentration of the medium. No bubble propulsion was observed when the micromotors were in pure water or sodium nitrate solution. However, their fast movement (300 µm s−1) resulted from pitting and macro-galvanic corrosion in chloride-rich solutions. Mg/Ti/Ni/Au micromotors were surface-functionalized with long-chain alkanethiols for on-the-fly removal of oil droplets. Furthermore, the Ni in the micromotors facilitated their magnetic guidance to capture and transport motor oil droplets from seawater. Table 3 summarizes Mg-based micromotors for environmental remediation.

Table 3.

Process and performance parameters of a magnesium-based micromotors for environmental applications

Sl. no Composition Particle size (µm) Thickness of deposited layer (nm) Velocity (µm/s) Pollutant Antibacterial/pollutant removal agent/sensing Actuation method Cleaning time (s) Immersion medium Bacteria killing efficiency Refs 1 Mg/Au/PLGA/Alg/chitosan 20 36.5 (drinking water) 72.6 (seawater) E. coli Chitosan Chemical 600 Drinking water/seawater 96% [220] 2 Mg/Au/TiO2 20 ALD for TiO2 deposition 80 CBWA TiO2 Chemical 900 0.08 M NaCl 86% [96] 3 Mg/Ni/Ti/Au 20 80 nm Ni/20 nm Ti/10 nm Au 90 Motor oil droplet Alkanethiol Chemical + magnetic 60 Seawater – [50] 4 Mg/Au 20 ± 5 20 nm layer of Au 108 ± 18 Diphenyl phthalate Chemical 300 Milk ˜100% [221] 5 Mg/Ni/Au 44 80 nm Ni/10 nm Au – Organophosphorus (OP) nerve agent p-nitrophenol – Chemical + magnetic – – – [222] 6 Mg/Fe/AgNP@Au 15 ± 5 – 26.9 ± 1.8 (pH 5) E. coli AgNP Chemical + magnetic – Seawater  > 80% [150]

Zinc-Based Micromotors

Zn can be used for self-sacrificing micromotors that do not cause toxicity after degradation. Zn-based micromotors have efficient hydrogen bubble propulsion in an acidic environment because of the Zn–acid reaction. The velocity of the Zn-based micromotor could be tuned by adjusting the medium pH and or the design of the micromotor.

Lin et al. reported a gallium/zinc (Ga/Zn) micromotor for targeted antibacterial chemotherapy [223]. The Ga/Zn micromotor was fabricated by partially coating a Ga layer on a Zn core by microcontact printing (Fig. 8a). These hydrogen-powered micromotors exhibited rapid movement (382.3 µm s−1) because of the galvanic effect of Ga and Zn in gastroenteric acid. Complete degradation of Ga/Zn micromotors in gastroenteric acid led to the release of GaIII ions, which showed antibacterial activity against H. pylori. The movement of Ga/Zn micromotors changes the diffusion pattern of Ga from passive to active, which explains their enhanced antibacterial efficacy.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Schematic of the fabrication of a (a) Zn/Ga micromotor. Reproduced with permission [223].

Copyright 2021, Wiley Publication. (b) Zn/Fe Janus micromotor in simulated gastric acid. After Zn degradation, the Fe shell degrades to Fe2+ ions. Reproduced with permission [140]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (c) DOX/PASP/Fe-Zn micromotor. Reproduced with permission [224]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (d) Zn/PEDOT + SRB − microrod. Reproduced with permission [226]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier

Chen et al. developed Zn/Fe Janus micromotors and evaluated their performance in simulated gastric acid [140]. The micromotors reached a velocity of 51.2 µm s−1 and showed active movement for 2 min in gastric acid. After 5 min of immersion, a semi-opaque Fe shell was found in the acidic solution, suggesting complete degradation of the Zn core (Fig. 8b). Inductive coupled plasma (ICP) analysis of the acidic medium indicated a significant increase in the Fe ion concentration after 10 min of immersion. This could be attributed to the self-destruction of the micromotors.

Wang and coworkers fabricated a Zn-core-based Fe and poly(aspartic acid) (PASP) layer containing a DOX-loaded micro-rocket to treat gastric cancer (Fig. 8c) [224]. The drug-loaded micro-rocket used gastric acid as a fuel for propulsion, and its location could be controlled magnetically. It could permeate the gastric mucus gel layer and release DOX in the stomach wall in an acidic environment. The micro-rocket moved at an average velocity of 34.0 ± 7.2 μm s−1 by hydrogen bubble propulsion, whereas magnetic actuation induced an average velocity of 29.2 ± 7.9 μm s−1. The slow velocity of magnetically controlled micro-rockets compared to self-propelled micro-rockets indicated a change in direction due to magnetic navigation. In vitro study demonstrated that a combination of self-propulsion and magnetic navigation improved drug delivery compared to an only self-propelled micro-rocket. Furthermore, in vivo drug delivery in the mouse stomach showed good agreement with the in vitro results.

PEDOT/Zn micromotor were fabricated by template-directed electrodeposition [225]. The micromotors were orally administered to the mouse stomach, and their autonomous motion, toxicity, and retention on the stomach wall were evaluated. In gastric fluid, PEDOT/Zn micromotors moved at a velocity of 60 µm s−1. In the highly acidic gastric environment (pH 2), the self-propelled Zn micrormotors showed propulsion for 10 min. In vivo studies indicated that Zn-based conical micromotors had enhanced penetration and retention in porous gel-like mucus layers as a result of their autonomous propulsion. Although these micromotors penetrated the gel-like mucus layer of the stomach, they did not damage epithelial cells.

Cui et al. proposed a battery-driven drug delivery system [226] fabricated by template-directed electrodeposition. It consisted of a Zn microrod and a positively charged PEDOT shell containing anionic model drug sulforhodamine B (SRB−) (Fig. 8d). When the device was immersed in a physiological solution, two redox reactions occurred simultaneously. At a low pH (gastric fluid), the Zn core oxidized due to its reaction with gastric fluid and moved by hydrogen bubble propulsion. By contrast, the PEDOT+ shell was reduced as a result of the consumption of electrons generated by Zn oxidation and the incorporated SRB− drug was released. Both of these reactions were governed by the local pH. Therefore, at neutral pH localized drug release could occur around the gastric mucus layer and subcutaneous tissue. Mice treated with Zn-microrods showed more intense fluorescence (8.0 ± 1.4 × 108 p s−1) than the Cu microrod group (2.1 ± 1.2 × 108 p s−1). This result could be attributed to the rapid movement of Zn microrods in gastric fluid. Similarly, a significant increase in fluorescence intensity (2.6 ± 1.2 × 109 p s−1) was noted for subcutaneously injected Zn microrods because of payload release at pH 7.4. Furthermore, a histological study did not indicate significant inflammation of stomach or subcutaneous tissue. Therefore, Zn-based devices could be used safely for drug delivery. The fabrication methods and performance parameters of Zn-based micromotors are listed in Table 4.

Table 4.

Process and performance parameters of a zinc-based micromotors for biomedical applications

Sl. no Composition Particle size (µm) Thickness of deposited layer (nm) Velocity (µm/s) Carrier Drug used Actuation method Average life time (s) Immersion medium In vivo model Refs 1 Zn/Ga 8.5 ± 0.8 0.2 µm 382.3 (pH 0.5) 161.2 (pH 2) – – Chemical 33 (pH 0.5) 312 (pH 2) Simulated gastric fluid – [223] 2 Zn/Fe 30 150 40 – – Chemical + magnetic 120 Simulated Gastric fluid – [140] 3 Zn/Fe/DOX@PASP PASP layer 0.5–1 µm 34.0 ± 7.2 – DOX Chemical + magnetic 135 ± 37 Simulated gastric fluid Mice [224] 4 PEDOT/Zn 20 µm (L) 5 µm (diameter) 60 PEDOT – Chemical 600 Simulated gastric fluid Mice [225]

Iron-Based Microrobots

Iron is the most abundant material in the Earth’s crust and an essential component of hemoglobin and myoglobin. The potential of Fe-based materials for degradable stents has been evaluated [227–229]. Fe can also be used in microrobots based on its favorable biocompatibility and magnetic response.

Alcantara et al. fabricated an Fe-based helical and roller microrobot by 3D template-assisted electrodeposition (Fig. 9a–f) [141]. In vitro degradation test showed that the micro-helices were degraded after 20 min of immersion in simulated gastric acid (Fig. 9g–h). According to live-dead imaging, Fe micro-helices did not exert a toxic effect on HCT116 cells after 4 days of incubation. The velocities of the micro-helix and scaffold-like micro-roller were compared under magnetic actuation. The micro-helix showed a maximum velocity of 42 µm s−1 at 10 mT and 7 Hz, whereas the porous micro-sphere exhibited a maximum velocity of 25 µm s−1 at 10 mT and 5 Hz in 100 cSt silicone oil. The upstream motion of the fully metallic Fe micro-helix and its Ni-coated polymer counterpart was measured in a microfluidic channel in water under a rotating magnetic field (20 mT and 30 Hz). Although both microstructures could swim at a velocity of 32 µm s−1under an applied magnetic field (20 mT and 30 Hz), the polymer structure exhibited unstable behavior. Therefore, a fully magnetic microstructure might be able to navigate human-vasculature regions with high flow velocities because of their generation of a high level of magnetic torque.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Scanning electron micrographs of 3D template-assisted electrodeposited iron-based (a) and (d) micro-helices, (b) and (e) micro-roller and (c) and (f) double helices. In vitro degradation of iron-based microrobot in simulated gastric fluid (g) before and (h) after 20 min of incubation. Scale bar 50 µm. Reproduced with permission [141].

Copyright 2019, Wiley publication

Concluding Remarks and Future Directions

In the last decade, numerous research projects have developed degradable metallic micromotors as proofs of concept. Mg, Zn, and Fe are useful for degradable micromotors/robots because they react with water or physiological solutions, leading to complete degradation. To date, most degradable metallic micromotors use chemical reactions with water for propulsion. The lifetime of degradable metals can be tuned by functionalization and alloying. These materials have inherently excellent biocompatibility, including environmentally compatible degradation products. Also, degradable metals have potential as nutritional supplements, and their daily intake by human is high.

Degradable micromotors have a limited lifetime and uncontrolled autonomous motion. For example, the rapid degradation of Mg in physiological solutions leads to a shorter lifetime and can result in Mg being unable to efficiently perform its intended role. Therefore, the design of degradable micromotors is key to their propulsion and performance. To prolong the lifetime of degradable micromotors, the size and shape of the opening at its end must be optimized. Micromotors are used as drug carriers and can exert a therapeutic effect by generating hydrogen. However, hydrogen has low water solubility and can cause embolism. Hence, micromotors should be designed in such a way that they can be degraded in a controlled manner without causing adverse reactions.

Ions released from micromotors increase the local ion concentration, possibly resulting in detrimental effects. For example, excessive release of Mg ions leads to hyper-magnesia with side effects of nausea, low blood pressure, and low heart rate. An optimized design, including favorable surface modifications, is required for real-life application of degradable micromotors.

Mg micromotors degrade more rapidly than Zn and Fe micromotors/robots. Consequently, an exclusive design approach is necessary for Mg micromotors to extend their effective lifespan. By contrast, Zn and Fe exhibit relatively slow degradation rates due to their higher standard electrode potential than Mg. Hence, it is anticipated that Zn and Fe might show enhanced efficiency in carrying out their respective tasks. Nonetheless, the lower daily intake and biocompatibility might affect their implementation. To date, few studies have reported the potential of Zn and Fe-based micromotor/robots for biomedical and environmental applications. Therefore, future research may focus on new design strategies to uncover the potential of these two biodegradable metals for biomedical and environmental applications.

Surface functionalization of degradable robots may allow them to perform as smart materials. Therefore, next-generation degradable micromotors should incorporate smart materials to enhance their intelligence and performance. Present-generation degradable robots are propelled in an uncontrolled manner by chemical reactions of water/acid. For guided drug delivery or environmental remediation, a magnetic material (Ni, SPIONs) can be integrated to enable magnetic guidance. Furthermore, the magnetically guided lifetime of a degradable micromotor can be extended by full encapsulation with a degradable polymer, preventing initial rapid degradation. Therefore, the development of next-generation degradable micromotors is anticipated to have a marked impact in various fields, such as targeted drug delivery, diagnostics, and environmental remediation.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Convergence Research of Scientific Challenges through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) and the DGIST R&D Program (No. 2021M3F7A1082275 and 23-CoE-BT-02) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no interest conflict. They have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

1.S. Jeon, S.H. Park, E. Kim, J. Kim, S.W. Kim et al., A magnetically powered stem cell based microrobot for minimally invasive stem cell delivery via the intranasal pathway in a mouse brain. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10(19), 2100801 (2021). 10.1002/adhm.202100801 [DOI] [PubMed] 2.J. Giltinan, V. Sridhar, U. Bozuyuk, D. Sheehan, M. Sitti, 3D microprinting of iron platinum nanoparticle-based magnetic mobile microrobots. Adv. Intell. Syst. 3(1), 2000204 (2021). 10.1002/aisy.202000204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 3.J. Vyskocil, C.C. Mayorga-Martinez, E. Jablonska, F. Novotny, T. Ruml et al., Cancer cells microsurgery via asymmetric bent surface Au/Ag/Ni microrobotic scalpels through a transversal rotating magnetic field. ACS Nano 14(7), 8247–8256 (2020). 10.1021/acsnano.0c01705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 4.S. Fusco, H.-W. Huang, K.E. Peyer, C. Peters, M. Häberli et al., Shape-switching microrobots for medical applications: the influence of shape in drug delivery and locomotion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(12), 6803–6811 (2015). 10.1021/acsami.5b00181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 5.C.K. Schmidt, M. Medina-Sánchez, R.J. Edmondson, O.G. Schmidt, Engineering microrobots for targeted cancer therapies from a medical perspective. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 5618 (2020). 10.1038/s41467-020-19322-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 6.J. Li, H. Shen, H. Zhou, R. Shi, C. Wu et al., Antimicrobial micro/nanorobotic materials design: from passive combat to active therapy. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 152, 100712 (2023). 10.1016/j.mser.2022.100712 [Google Scholar] 7.M. Ussia, M. Urso, M. Kratochvilova, J. Navratil, J. Balvan et al., Magnetically driven self degrading zinc containing cystine microrobots for treatment of prostate cancer. Small 19(17), 2208259 (2023). 10.1002/smll.202208259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 8.X. Hu, N. Wang, X. Guo, Z. Liang, H. Sun et al., A sub-nanostructural transformable nanozyme for tumor photocatalytic therapy. Nano-micro Lett. 14, 101 (2022). 10.1007/s40820-022-00848-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 9.J. Wang, R. Dong, H. Wu, Y. Cai, B. Ren, A review on artificial micro/nanomotors for cancer targeted delivery, diagnosis, and therapy. Nano-micro Lett. 12, 11 (2020). 10.1007/s40820-019-0350-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 10.L. Li, Z. Yu, J. Liu, M. Yang, G. Shi et al., Swarming responsive photonic nanorobots for motile-targeting microenvironmental mapping and mapping-guided photothermal treatment. Nano-micro Lett. 15, 141 (2023). 10.1007/s40820-023-01095-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 11.X. Wang, X.H. Qin, C. Hu, A. Terzopoulou, X.Z. Chen et al., 3D printed enzymatically biodegradable soft helical microswimmers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28(45), 1804107 (2018). 10.1002/adfm.201804107 [Google Scholar] 12.S. Noh, S. Jeon, E. Kim, U. Oh, D. Park et al., A biodegradable magnetic microrobot based on gelatin methacrylate for precise delivery of stem cells with mass production capability. Small 18(25), 2107888 (2022). 10.1002/smll.202107888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 13.A. Terzopoulou, X. Wang, X.Z. Chen, M. Palacios Corella, C. Pujante et al., Biodegradable metal organic framework based microrobots (MOFBOTS). Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9(20), 2001031 (2020). 10.1002/adhm.202001031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 14.T. Wei, J. Liu, D. Li, S. Chen, Y. Zhang et al., Development of magnet driven and image guided degradable microrobots for the precise delivery of engineered stem cells for cancer therapy. Small 16(41), 1906908 (2020). 10.1002/smll.201906908 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 15.P. TirgarBahnamiri, S. Bagheri-Khoulenjani, Biodegradable microrobots for targeting cell delivery. Med. Hypothses 102, 56–60 (2017). 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 16.S. Fusco, F. Ullrich, J. Pokki, G. Chatzipirpiridis, B. Özkale et al., Microrobots: a new era in ocular drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 11(11), 1815–1826 (2014). 10.1517/17425247.2014.938633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 17.S. Kim, S. Lee, J. Lee, B.J. Nelson, L. Zhang et al., Fabrication and manipulation of ciliary microrobots with non-reciprocal magnetic actuation. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 30713 (2016). 10.1038/srep30713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 18.J.-Y. Kim, S. Jeon, J. Lee, S. Lee, J. Lee et al., A simple and rapid fabrication method for biodegradable drug-encapsulating microrobots using laser micromachining, and characterization thereof. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 266, 276–287 (2018). 10.1016/j.snb.2018.03.033 [Google Scholar] 19.S.R. Dabbagh, M.R. Sarabi, M.T. Birtek, S. Seyfi, M. Sitti et al., 3D-printed microrobots from design to translation. Nat. Commun. 13(1), 5875 (2022). 10.1038/s41467-022-33409-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 20.Q. Chen, N. Wang, M. Zhu, J. Lu, H. Zhong et al., TiO2 nanoparticles cause mitochondrial dysfunction, activate inflammatory responses, and attenuate phagocytosis in macrophages: a proteomic and metabolomic insight. Redox Biol. 15, 266–276 (2018). 10.1016/j.redox.2017.12.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 21.E.M. Higbee-Dempsey, A. Amirshaghaghi, M.J. Case, M. Bouché, J. Kim et al., Biodegradable gold nanoclusters with improved excretion due to pH-triggered hydrophobic to hydrophilic transition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142(17), 7783–7794 (2020). 10.1021/jacs.9b13813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 22.H.-J. Liu, M. Wang, S. Shi, X. Hu, P. Xu, A therapeutic sheep in metastatic wolf’s clothing: Trojan horse approach for cancer brain metastases treatment. Nano-micro Lett. 14(1), 114 (2022). 10.1007/s40820-022-00861-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 23.J. Park, C. Jin, S. Lee, J.Y. Kim, H. Choi, Magnetically actuated degradable microrobots for actively controlled drug release and hyperthermia therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8(16), 1900213 (2019). 10.1002/adhm.201900213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 24.T. Wei, J. Li, L. Zheng, C. Wang, F. Li et al., Development of a cell loading microrobot with simultaneously improved degradability and mechanical strength for performing in vivo delivery tasks. Adv. Intell. Syst. 3(11), 2100052 (2021). 10.1002/aisy.202100052 [Google Scholar] 25.J.-M. Lü, X. Wang, C. Marin-Muller, H. Wang, P.H. Lin et al., Current advances in research and clinical applications of PLGA-based nanotechnology. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 9(4), 325–341 (2009). 10.1586/erm.09.15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 26.Y. Liu, J. Luo, X. Chen, W. Liu, T. Chen, Cell membrane coating technology: a promising strategy for biomedical applications. Nano-micro Lett. 11, 46 (2019). 10.1007/s40820-019-0330-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 27.S. Jin, X. Xia, J. Huang, C. Yuan, Y. Zuo et al., Recent advances in PLGA-based biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater. 127, 56–79 (2021). 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 28.E.J. Go, E.Y. Kang, S.K. Lee, S. Park, J.H. Kim et al., An osteoconductive PLGA scaffold with bioactive β-TCP and anti-inflammatory Mg (OH)2 to improve in vivo bone regeneration. Biomater. Sci. 8(3), 937–948 (2020). 10.1039/c9bm01864f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 29.S.Y. Choi, W. Hur, B.K. Kim, C. Shasteen, M.H. Kim et al., Bioabsorbable bone fixation plates for X-ray imaging diagnosis by a radiopaque layer of barium sulfate and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid). J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 103(3), 596–607 (2015). 10.1002/jbm.b.33235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 30.A. Srivastava, N. Bhatnagar, Production and characterisation of new bioresorbable radiopaque Mg–Zn–Y alloy to improve X-ray visibility of polymeric scaffolds. J. Magnes. Alloy 10(6), 1694–1703 (2022). 10.1016/j.jma.2020.11.010 [Google Scholar] 31.C. Chen, E. Karshalev, J. Guan, J. Wang, Magnesium based micromotors: water powered propulsion, multifunctionality, and biomedical and environmental applications. Small 14(23), 1704252 (2018). 10.1002/smll.201704252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 32.W. Gao, A. Pei, J. Wang, Water-driven micromotors. ACS Nano 6(9), 8432–8438 (2012). 10.1021/nn303309z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 33.M. You, C. Chen, L. Xu, F. Mou, J. Guan, Intelligent micro/nanomotors with taxis. Acc. Chem. Res. 51(12), 3006–3014 (2018). 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 34.X.Z. Chen, B. Jang, D. Ahmed, C. Hu, C. De Marco et al., Small scale machines driven by external power sources. Adv. Mater. 30(15), 1705061 (2018). 10.1002/adma.201705061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 35.V. Agrahari, V. Agrahari, M.-L. Chou, C.H. Chew, J. Noll et al., Intelligent micro-/nanorobots as drug and cell carrier devices for biomedical therapeutic advancement: promising development opportunities and translational challenges. Biomaterials 260, 120163 (2020). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 36.S. Campuzano, J. Orozco, D. Kagan, M. Guix, W. Gao et al., Bacterial isolation by lectin-modified microengines. Nano Lett. 12(1), 396–401 (2012). 10.1021/nl203717q [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 37.S. Shivalkar, P.K. Gautam, A. Verma, K. Maurya, M.P. Sk et al., Autonomous magnetic microbots for environmental remediation developed by organic waste derived carbon dots. J. Environ. Manag. 297, 113322 (2021). 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 38.T. Maric, M.Z.M. Nasir, N.F. Rosli, M. Budanović, R.D. Webster et al., Microrobots derived from variety plant pollen grains for efficient environmental clean up and as an anti-cancer drug carrier. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(19), 2000112 (2020). 10.1002/adfm.202000112 [Google Scholar] 39.Y. Zhang, K. Yan, F. Ji, L. Zhang, Enhanced removal of toxic heavy metals using swarming biohybrid adsorbents. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28(52), 1806340 (2018). 10.1002/adfm.201806340 [Google Scholar] 40.R. Maria-Hormigos, C.C. Mayorga-Martinez, M. Pumera, Soft magnetic microrobots for photoactive pollutant removal. Small Methods 7(1), 2201014 (2023). 10.1002/smtd.202201014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 41.B. Jurado-Sánchez, J. Wang, Micromotors for environmental applications: a review. Environ. Sci. Nano 5(7), 1530–1544 (2018). 10.1039/C8EN00299A [Google Scholar] 42.J.G.S. Moo, M. Pumera, Chemical energy powered nano/micro/macromotors and the environment. Chem. Eur. J. 21(1), 58–72 (2015). 10.1002/chem.201405011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 43.M. Guix, J. Orozco, M. Garcia, W. Gao, S. Sattayasamitsathit et al., Superhydrophobic alkanethiol-coated microsubmarines for effective removal of oil. ACS Nano 6(5), 4445–4451 (2012). 10.1021/nn301175b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 44.F. Mou, D. Pan, C. Chen, Y. Gao, L. Xu et al., Magnetically modulated pot-like MnFe2O4 micromotors: nanoparticle assembly fabrication and their capability for direct oil removal. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25(39), 6173–6181 (2015). 10.1002/adfm.201502835 [Google Scholar] 45.J. Orozco, G. Pan, S. Sattayasamitsathit, M. Galarnyk, J. Wang, Micromotors to capture and destroy anthrax simulant spores. Analyst 140(5), 1421–1427 (2015). 10.1039/C4AN02169J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 46.L. Soler, V. Magdanz, V.M. Fomin, S. Sanchez, O.G. Schmidt, Self-propelled micromotors for cleaning polluted water. ACS Nano 7(11), 9611–9620 (2013). 10.1021/nn405075d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 47.J. Parmar, D. Vilela, E. Pellicer, D. Esqué-de los Ojos, J. Sort et al., Reusable and long-lasting active microcleaners for heterogeneous water remediation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26(23), 4152–4161 (2016). 10.1002/adfm.201600381 48.B. Jurado-Sánchez, S. Sattayasamitsathit, W. Gao, L. Santos, Y. Fedorak et al., Self-propelled activated carbon Janus micromotors for efficient water purification. Small 11(4), 499–506 (2015). 10.1002/smll.201402215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 49.L. Dąbek, A. Picheta-Oleś, B. Szeląg, J. Szulżyk-Cieplak, G. Łagód, Modeling and optimization of pollutants removal during simultaneous adsorption onto activated carbon with advanced oxidation in aqueous environment. Materials 13(19), 4220 (2020). 10.3390/ma13194220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 50.W. Gao, X. Feng, A. Pei, Y. Gu, J. Li et al., Seawater-driven magnesium based Janus micromotors for environmental remediation. Nanoscale 5(11), 4696–4700 (2013). 10.1039/C3NR01458D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 51.D. Liu, T. Wang, Y. Lu, Untethered microrobots for active drug delivery: from rational design to clinical settings. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 11(3), 2102253 (2022). 10.1002/adhm.202102253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 52.X. Xu, J. Chen, S. Cai, Z. Long, Y. Zhang et al., A real-time wearable UV-radiation monitor based on a high-performance p-CuZns/n-TiO2 photodetector. Adv. Mater. 30(43), 1803165 (2018). 10.1002/adma.201803165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 53.A.M. Vargason, A.C. Anselmo, S. Mitragotri, The evolution of commercial drug delivery technologies. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5(9), 951–967 (2021). 10.1038/s41551-021-00698-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 54.M. Sitti, H. Ceylan, W. Hu, J. Giltinan, M. Turan et al., Biomedical applications of untethered mobile milli/microrobots. Proc. IEEE Inst. Electr. Electron Eng. 103(2), 205–224 (2015). 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2385105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 55.S. Gervasoni, J. Lussi, S. Viviani, Q. Boehler, N. Ochsenbein et al., Magnetically assisted robotic fetal surgery for the treatment of spina bifida. IEEE Trans. Med. Robot. Bionics 4(1), 85–93 (2022). 10.1109/TMRB.2022.3146351 [Google Scholar] 56.F. Soto, E. Karshalev, F. Zhang, B. Esteban Fernandez de Avila, A. Nourhani et al., Smart materials for microrobots. Chem. Rev. 122(5), 5365–5403 (2021). 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00999 [DOI] [PubMed] 57.G. Katsikis, J.F. Collis, S.M. Knudsen, V. Agache, J.E. Sader et al., Inertial and viscous flywheel sensing of nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 5099 (2021). 10.1038/s41467-021-25266-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 58.M. Xie, W. Zhang, C. Fan, C. Wu, Q. Feng et al., Bioinspired soft microrobots with precise magneto-collective control for microvascular thrombolysis. Adv. Mater. 32(26), 2000366 (2020). 10.1002/adma.202000366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 59.M.A. López, J. Prieto, J.E. Traver, I. Tejado, B.M. Vinagre et al., Testing non reciprocal motion of a swimming flexible small robot with single actuation, in 2018 19th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC) (2018), pp. 312–317. 10.1109/CarpathianCC.2018.8399647 60.S.R. Goudu, I.C. Yasa, X. Hu, H. Ceylan, W. Hu et al., Biodegradable untethered magnetic hydrogel milli-grippers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(50), 2004975 (2020). 10.1002/adfm.202004975 [Google Scholar] 61.K.E. Peyer, L. Zhang, B.J. Nelson, Bio-inspired magnetic swimming microrobots for biomedical applications. Nanoscale 5(4), 1259–1272 (2013). 10.1039/C2NR32554C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 62.S. Fusco, M.S. Sakar, S. Kennedy, C. Peters, S. Pane et al., Self-folding mobile microrobots for biomedical applications, in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2014), pp. 3777–3782. 10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907406 63.H. Kim, J. Ali, U.K. Cheang, J. Jeong, J.S. Kim et al., Micro manipulation using magnetic microrobots. J. Bionic Eng. 13(4), 515–524 (2016). 10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60324-4 [Google Scholar] 64.S. Jeon, S. Kim, S. Ha, S. Lee, E. Kim et al., Magnetically actuated microrobots as a platform for stem cell transplantation. Sci. Robot. 4(30), eaav4317 (2019). 10.1126/scirobotics.aav4317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 65.M. Dong, X. Wang, X.Z. Chen, F. Mushtaq, S. Deng et al., 3D-printed soft magnetoelectric microswimmers for delivery and differentiation of neuron-like cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(17), 1910323 (2020). 10.1002/adfm.201910323 [Google Scholar] 66.F. Qiu, B.J. Nelson, Magnetic helical micro-and nanorobots: toward their biomedical applications. Engineering 1(1), 21–26 (2015). 10.15302/J-ENG-2015005 [Google Scholar] 67.M.A. Zeeshan, R. Grisch, E. Pellicer, K.M. Sivaraman, K.E. Peyer et al., Hybrid helical magnetic microrobots obtained by 3D template-assisted electrodeposition. Small 10(7), 1284–1288 (2014). 10.1002/smll.201302856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 68.R. Venezian, I.S. Khalil, Understanding robustness of magnetically driven helical propulsion in viscous fluids using sensitivity analysis. Adv. Theory Simul. 5(4), 2100519 (2022). 10.1002/adts.202100519 [Google Scholar] 69.Y. Liu, Y. Yang, X. Yang, L. Yang, Y. Shen et al., Multi-functionalized micro-helical capsule robots with superior loading and releasing capabilities. J. Mater. Chem. B 9(5), 1441–1451 (2021). 10.1039/D0TB02329A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 70.K.E. Peyer, S. Tottori, F. Qiu, L. Zhang, B.J. Nelson, Magnetic helical micromachines. Chem. Eur. J. 19(1), 28–38 (2013). 10.1002/chem.201203364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 71.S. Kim, F. Qiu, S. Kim, A. Ghanbari, C. Moon et al., Fabrication and characterization of magnetic microrobots for three-dimensional cell culture and targeted transportation. Adv. Mater. 25(41), 5863–5868 (2013). 10.1002/adma.201301484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 72.Y. Jia, P. Liao, Y. Wang, D. Sun, Magnet-driven microwalker in surface motion based on frictional anisotropy. Adv. Intell. Syst. 4(11), 2200118 (2022). 10.1002/aisy.202200118 [Google Scholar] 73.K. Villa, M. Pumera, Fuel-free light-driven micro/nanomachines: artificial active matter mimicking nature. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48(19), 4966–4978 (2019). 10.1039/C9CS00090A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 74.L. Wang, A. Kaeer, D. Fischer, J. Simmchen, Photocatalytic TiO2 micromotors for removal of microplastics and suspended matter. ACS A. Mater. Interfaces 11(36), 32937–32944 (2019). 10.1021/acsami.9b06128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 75.L. Kong, C.C. Mayorga-Martinez, J. Guan, M. Pumera, Photocatalytic micromotors activated by UV to visible light for environmental remediation, micropumps, reversible assembly, transportation, and biomimicry. Small 16(27), 1903179 (2020). 10.1002/smll.201903179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 76.J. Kim, S. Jo, W.-J. Lee, J. Lim, T.S. Lee, Moving photocatalyst of a titanium dioxide-based micromotor asymmetrically decorated with conjugated polymer dots. Mater. Des. 219, 110743 (2022). 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110743 [Google Scholar] 77.R. Dong, Q. Zhang, W. Gao, A. Pei, B. Ren, Highly efficient light-driven TiO2-Au Janus micromotors. ACS Nano 10(1), 839–844 (2016). 10.1021/acsnano.5b05940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 78.R. Dong, Y. Hu, Y. Wu, W. Gao, B. Ren et al., Visible-light-driven BiOI-based Janus micromotor in pure water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(5), 1722–1725 (2017). 10.1021/jacs.6b09863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 79.É. O’Neel-Judy, D. Nicholls, J. Castañeda, J.G. Gibbs, Light-activated, multi-semiconductor hybrid microswimmers. Small 14(32), 1801860 (2018). 10.1002/smll.201801860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 80.B. Jang, A. Hong, H.E. Kang, C. Alcantara, S. Charreyron et al., Multiwavelength light-responsive Au/B-TiO2 Janus micromotors. ACS Nano 11(6), 6146–6154 (2017). 10.1021/acsnano.7b02177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 81.Y. Wu, R. Dong, Q. Zhang, B. Ren, Dye-enhanced self-electrophoretic propulsion of light-driven TiO2-Au Janus micromotors. Nano-micro Lett. 9, 12 (2017). 10.1007/s40820-017-0133-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 82.J. Vrba, C. Maslen, J. Maxova, J. Duras, I. Rehor et al., An automated platform for assembling light-powered hydrogel microrobots and their subsequent chemical binding. J. Comput. Sci. 55, 101446 (2021). 10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101446 [Google Scholar] 83.E.C. Dreaden, A.M. Alkilany, X. Huang, C.J. Murphy, M.A. El-Sayed, The golden age: gold nanoparticles for biomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41(7), 2740–2779 (2012). 10.1039/C1CS15237H [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 84.Y.V. Kaneti, C. Chen, M. Liu, X. Wang, J.L. Yang et al., Carbon-coated gold nanorods: a facile route to biocompatible materials for photothermal applications. ACS A. Mater. Interfaces 7(46), 25658–25668 (2015). 10.1021/acsami.5b07975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 85.J. Nam, N. Won, H. Jin, H. Chung, S. Kim, pH-induced aggregation of gold nanoparticles for photothermal cancer therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131(38), 13639–13645 (2009). 10.1021/ja902062j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 86.W. Wang, L.A. Castro, M. Hoyos, T.E. Mallouk, Autonomous motion of metallic microrods propelled by ultrasound. ACS Nano 6(7), 6122–6132 (2012). 10.1021/nn301312z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 87.D. Kagan, M.J. Benchimol, J.C. Claussen, E. Chuluun-Erdene, S. Esener et al., Acoustic droplet vaporization and propulsion of perfluorocarbon-loaded microbullets for targeted tissue penetration and deformation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51(30), 7519–7522 (2012). 10.1002/anie.201201902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 88.R. Myers, C. Coviello, P. Erbs, J. Foloppe, C. Rowe et al., Polymeric cups for cavitation-mediated delivery of oncolytic vaccinia virus. Mol. Ther. 24(9), 1627–1633 (2016). 10.1038/mt.2016.139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 89.J.J. Kwan, R. Myers, C.M. Coviello, S.M. Graham, A.R. Shah et al., Ultrasound-propelled nanocups for drug delivery. Small 11(39), 5305–5314 (2015). 10.1002/smll.201501322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 90.Y. Zhang, S. Li, The secondary bjerknes force between two gas bubbles under dual-frequency acoustic excitation. Ultrason. Sonochem. 29, 129–145 (2016). 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.08.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 91.N.F. Laubli, M.S. Gerlt, A. Wuthrich, R.T. Lewis, N. Shamsudhin et al., Embedded microbubbles for acoustic manipulation of single cells and microfluidic applications. Anal. Chem. 93(28), 9760–9770 (2021). 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 92.A. Aghakhani, A. Pena-Francesch, U. Bozuyuk, H. Cetin, P. Wrede et al., High shear rate propulsion of acoustic microrobots in complex biological fluids. Sci. Adv. 8(10), eabm5126 (2022). 10.1126/sciadv.abm5126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 93.J. Li, I. Rozen, J. Wang, Rocket science at the nanoscale. ACS Nano 10(6), 5619–5634 (2016). 10.1021/acsnano.6b02518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 94.W.Z. Teo, H. Wang, M. Pumera, Beyond platinum: silver-catalyst based bubble-propelled tubular micromotors. Chem. Commun. 52(23), 4333–4336 (2016). 10.1039/C6CC00115G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 95.J.R. Baylis, A.E.S. John, X. Wang, E.B. Lim, M.L. Statz et al., Self-propelled dressings containing thrombin and tranexamic acid improve short-term survival in a swine model of lethal junctional hemorrhage. Shock 46(3), 123–128 (2016). 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 96.J. Li, V.V. Singh, S. Sattayasamitsathit, J. Orozco, K. Kaufmann et al., Water-driven micromotors for rapid photocatalytic degradation of biological and chemical warfare agents. ACS Nano 8(11), 11118–11125 (2014). 10.1021/nn505029k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 97.W.F. Paxton, K.C. Kistler, C.C. Olmeda, A. Sen, S.K.St. Angelo et al., Catalytic nanomotors: autonomous movement of striped nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126(41), 13424–13431 (2004). 10.1021/ja047697z [DOI] [PubMed] 98.G. Zhao, M. Viehrig, M. Pumera, Challenges of the movement of catalytic micromotors in blood. Lab Chip 13(10), 1930–1936 (2013). 10.1039/C3LC41423J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 99.M. Safdar, S.U. Khan, J. Jänis, Progress toward catalytic micro-and nanomotors for biomedical and environmental applications. Adv. Mater. 30(24), 1703660 (2018). 10.1002/adma.201703660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 100.K.K. Dey, A. Sen, Chemically propelled molecules and machines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(23), 7666–7676 (2017). 10.1021/jacs.7b02347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 101.S. Wang, N. Wu, Selecting the swimming mechanisms of colloidal particles: bubble propulsion versus self-diffusiophoresis. Langmuir 30(12), 3477–3486 (2014). 10.1021/la500182f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 102.W. Gao, S. Sattayasamitsathit, A. Uygun, A. Pei, A. Ponedal et al., Polymer-based tubular microbots: role of composition and preparation. Nanoscale 4(7), 2447–2453 (2012). 10.1039/C2NR30138E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 103.A. Martín, B. Jurado-Sánchez, A. Escarpa, J. Wang, Template electrosynthesis of high-performance graphene microengines. Small 11(29), 3568–3574 (2015). 10.1002/smll.201500008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 104.D. Vilela, A.C. Hortelão, R. Balderas-Xicohténcatl, M. Hirscher, K. Hahn et al., Facile fabrication of mesoporous silica micro-jets with multi-functionalities. Nanoscale 9(37), 13990–13997 (2017). 10.1039/C7NR04527A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 105.A. Paryab, H.R.M. Hosseini, F. Abedini, A. Dabbagh, Synthesis of magnesium-based Janus micromotors capable of magnetic navigation and antibiotic drug incorporation. New J. Chem. 44(17), 6947–6957 (2020). 10.1039/D0NJ00537A [Google Scholar] 106.W. Gao, S. Sattayasamitsathit, J. Orozco, J. Wang, Highly efficient catalytic microengines: template electrosynthesis of polyaniline/platinum microtubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133(31), 11862–11864 (2011). 10.1021/ja203773g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 107.W. Gao, A. Pei, R. Dong, J. Wang, Catalytic iridium-based Janus micromotors powered by ultralow levels of chemical fuels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136(6), 2276–2279 (2014). 10.1021/ja413002e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 108.S.K. Srivastava, M. Guix, O.G. Schmidt, Wastewater mediated activation of micromotors for efficient water cleaning. Nano Lett. 16(1), 817–821 (2016). 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 109.S.-J. Song, C.C. Mayorga-Martinez, D. Huska, M. Pumera, Engineered magnetic plant biobots for nerve agent removal. NPG Asia Mater. 14(1), 79 (2022). 10.1038/s41427-022-00425-0 [Google Scholar] 110.K. Han, C.W. Shields IV., O.D. Velev, Engineering of self-propelling microbots and microdevices powered by magnetic and electric fields. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28(25), 1705953 (2018). 10.1002/adfm.201705953 [Google Scholar] 111.M.Z. Bazant, T.M. Squires, Induced-charge electrokinetic phenomena: theory and microfluidic applications. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(6), 066101 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.066101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 112.L. Huang, Y. Pan, M. Wang, L. Ren, Driving modes and characteristics of biomedical micro-robots. Eng. Regen. 4(4), 411–426 (2023). 10.1016/j.engreg.2023.08.001 [Google Scholar] 113.W. Gao, K.M. Manesh, J. Hua, S. Sattayasamitsathit, J. Wang, Hybrid nanomotor: a catalytically/magnetically powered adaptive nanowire swimmer. Small 7(14), 2047–2051 (2011). 10.1002/smll.201100213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 114.C. Chen, S. Tang, H. Teymourian, E. Karshalev, F. Zhang et al., Chemical/light-powered hybrid micromotors with “on-the-fly” optical brakes. Angew. Chem. 130(27), 8242–8246 (2018). 10.1002/anie.201803457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 115.J. Li, T. Li, T. Xu, M. Kiristi, W. Liu et al., Magneto-acoustic hybrid nanomotor. Nano Lett. 15(7), 4814–4821 (2015). 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01945 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 116.Y. Alapan, O. Yasa, B. Yigit, I.C. Yasa, P. Erkoc et al., Microrobotics and microorganisms: biohybrid autonomous cellular robots. Annu. Rev. Control Robot. Auton. Syst. 2, 205–230 (2019). 10.1146/annurev-control-053018-023803 [Google Scholar] 117.X. Yan, Q. Zhou, M. Vincent, Y. Deng, J. Yu et al., Multifunctional biohybrid magnetite microrobots for imaging-guided therapy. Sci. Robot. 2(12), eaaq1155 (2017). 10.1126/scirobotics.aaq1155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 118.J. Xing, T. Yin, S. Li, T. Xu, A. Ma et al., Sequential magneto-actuated and optics-triggered biomicrorobots for targeted cancer therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31(11), 2008262 (2021). 10.1002/adfm.202008262 [Google Scholar] 119.X. Yan, Q. Zhou, J. Yu, T. Xu, Y. Deng et al., Magnetite nanostructured porous hollow helical microswimmers for targeted delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25(33), 5333–5342 (2015). 10.1002/adfm.201502248 [Google Scholar] 120.X. Yan, J. Xu, Q. Zhou, D. Jin, C.I. Vong et al., Molecular cargo delivery using multicellular magnetic microswimmers. A. Mater. Today 15, 242–251 (2019). 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.02.006 [Google Scholar] 121.B.-W. Park, J. Zhuang, O. Yasa, M. Sitti, Multifunctional bacteria-driven microswimmers for targeted active drug delivery. ACS Nano 11(9), 8910–8923 (2017). 10.1021/acsnano.7b03207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 122.Y. Alapan, O. Yasa, O. Schauer, J. Giltinan, A.F. Tabak et al., Soft erythrocyte-based bacterial microswimmers for cargo delivery. Sci. Robot. 3(17), eaar4423 (2018). 10.1126/scirobotics.aar4423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 123.K. Hou, Y. Zhang, M. Bao, C. Xin, Z. Wei et al., A multifunctional magnetic red blood cell-mimetic micromotor for drug delivery and image-guided therapy. ACS A. Mater. Interfaces 14(3), 3825–3837 (2022). 10.1021/acsami.1c21331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 124.X. He, H. Nie, K. Wang, W. Tan, X. Wu et al., In vivo study of biodistribution and urinary excretion of surface-modified silica nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 80(24), 9597–9603 (2008). 10.1021/ac801882g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 125.V. Gómez-Vallejo, M. Puigivila, S. Plaza-García, B. Szczupak, R. Piñol et al., PEG-copolymer-coated iron oxide nanoparticles that avoid the reticuloendothelial system and act as kidney MRI contrast agents. Nanoscale 10(29), 14153–14164 (2018). 10.1039/C8NR03084G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 126.R. Weissleder, D.D. Stark, B.L. Engelstad, B.R. Bacon, C.C. Compton et al., Superparamagnetic iron oxide: pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Am. J. Roentgenol. 152(1), 167–173 (1989). 10.2214/ajr.152.1.167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 127.J.W. Bulte, T. Douglas, B. Witwer, S.-C. Zhang, E. Strable et al., Magnetodendrimers allow endosomal magnetic labeling and in vivo tracking of stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 19(12), 1141–1147 (2001). 10.1038/nbt1201-1141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 128.M. Mahmoudi, H. Hofmann, B. Rothen-Rutishauser, A. Petri-Fink, Assessing the in vitro and in vivo toxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 112(4), 2323–2338 (2012). 10.1021/cr2002596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 129.J.M. Veranth, E.G. Kaser, M.M. Veranth, M. Koch, G.S. Yost, Cytokine responses of human lung cells (BEAS-2B) treated with micron-sized and nanoparticles of metal oxides compared to soil dusts. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 4(2), 1–18 (2007). 10.1186/1743-8977-4-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 130.H. Ceylan, I.C. Yasa, O. Yasa, A.F. Tabak, J. Giltinan et al., 3D-printed biodegradable microswimmer for theranostic cargo delivery and release. ACS Nano 13(3), 3353–3362 (2019). 10.1021/acsnano.8b09233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 131.B.D. Ulery, L.S. Nair, C.T. Laurencin, Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers. J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 49(12), 832–864 (2011). 10.1002/polb.22259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] 132.T.S. Santra, Microfluidics and Bio-mems: Devices and applications (CRC Press, 2020), pp. 95–148 133.S.-L. Ding, X. Liu, X.-Y. Zhao, K.-T. Wang, W. Xiong et al., Microcarriers in aication for cartilage tissue engineering: recent progress and challenges. Bioact. Mater. 17, 81–108 (2022). 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 134.B.S. Zolnik, D.J. Burgess, Effect of acidic pH on PLGA microsphere degradation and release. J. Controll. Release 122(3), 338–344 (2007). 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.05.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 135.Y. Li, J. Wu, H. Oku, G. Ma, Polymer-modified micromotors with biomedical applications: promotion of functionalization. Adv. Nanobiomed. Res. 2(10), 2200074 (2022). 10.1002/anbr.202200074 [Google Scholar] 136.G. Go, A. Yoo, H.-W. Song, H.-K. Min, S. Zheng et al., Multifunctional biodegradable microrobot with programmable morphology for biomedical applications. ACS Nano 15(1), 1059–1076 (2020). 10.1021/acsnano.0c07954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 137.Z. Li, M. Leung, R. Hopper, R. Ellenbogen, M. Zhang, Feeder-free self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells in 3D porous natural polymer scaffolds. Biomaterials 31(3), 404–412 (2010). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 138.H. Ge, X. Chen, W. Liu, X. Lu, Z. Gu, Metal-based transient micromotors: from principle to environmental and biomedical applications. Chem. Asian J. 14(14), 2348–2356 (2019). 10.1002/asia.201900278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 139.A. Nourhani, E. Karshalev, F. Soto, J. Wang, Multigear bubble propulsion of transient micromotors. Research 2020, 7823615 (2020). 10.34133/2020/7823615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] 140.C. Chen, E. Karshalev, J. Li, F. Soto, R. Castillo et al., Transient micromotors that disappear when no longer needed. ACS Nano 10(11), 10389–10396 (2016). 10.1021/acsnano.6b06256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 141.C.C. Alcântara, S. Kim, S. Lee, B. Jang, P. Thakolkaran et al., 3D fabrication of fully iron magnetic microrobots. Small 15(16), 1805006 (2019). 10.1002/smll.201805006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 142.E. Karshalev, B. Esteban-Fernández de Ávila, M. Beltran-Gastelum, P. Angsantikul, S. Tang et al., Micromotor pills as a dynamic oral delivery platform. ACS Nano 12(8), 8397–8405 (2018). 10.1021/acsnano.8b03760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 143.Z. Wu, L. Li, Y. Yang, P. Hu, Y. Li et al., A microrobotic system guided by photoacoustic computed tomography for targeted navigation in intestines in vivo. Sci. Robot. 4(32), eaax0613 (2019). 10.1126/scirobotics.aax0613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 144.B.E.-F. de Ávila, P. Angsantikul, J. Li, M. Angel Lopez-Ramirez, D.E. Ramírez-Herrera et al., Micromotor-enabled active drug delivery for in vivo treatment of stomach infection. Nat. Commun. 8(1), 272 (2017). 10.1038/s41467-017-00309-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] 145.F. Mou, C. Chen, Q. Zhong, Y. Yin, H. Ma et al., Autonomous motion and temperature-controlled drug delivery of Mg/Pt-poly (n-isopropylacrylamide) Janus micromotors driven by simulated body fluid and blood plasma. ACS A. Mater. Interfaces 6(12), 9897–9903 (2014). 10.1021/am502729y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 146.T. Maric, S. Atladóttir, L.H.E. Thamdrup, O. Ilchenko, M. Ghavami et al., Self-propelled Janus micromotors for pH-responsive release of small molecule drug. A. Mater. Today 27, 101418 (2022). 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101418 [Google Scholar] 147.K. Liu, J. Ou, S. Wang, J. Gao, L. Liu et al., Magnesium-based micromotors for enhanced active and synergistic hydrogen chemotherapy. A. Mater. Today 20, 100694 (2020). 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100694 [Google Scholar] 148.Y. Zheng, H. Zhao, Y. Cai, B. Jurado-Sánchez, R. Dong, Recent advances in one-dimensional micro/nanomotors: fabrication, propulsion and aication. Nano-micro Lett. 15(1), 20 (2023). 10.1007/s40820-022-00988-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 149.A. Serrà, J. García-Torres, Electrochemistry: a basic and powerful tool for micro-and nanomotor fabrication and characterization. A. Mater. Today 22, 100939 (2021). 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.100939 [Google Scholar] 150.D. Vilela, M.M. Stanton, J. Parmar, S. Sánchez, Microbots decorated with silver nanoparticles kill bacteria in aqueous media. ACS A. Mater. Interfaces 9(27), 22093–22100 (2017). 10.1021/acsami.7b03006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 151.G. Song, A. Atrens, Understanding magnesium corrosion-a framework for improved alloy performance. Adv. Eng. Mater. 5(12), 837–858 (2003). 10.1002/adem.200310405 [Google Scholar] 152.F. Mou, C. Chen, H. Ma, Y. Yin, Q. Wu et al., Self-propelled micromotors driven by the magnesium-water reaction and their hemolytic properties. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52(28), 7208–7212 (2013). 10.1002/anie.201300913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 153.L. Kong, N. Rohaizad, M.Z.M. Nasir, J. Guan, M. Pumera, Micromotor-assisted human serum glucose biosensing. Anal. Chem. 91(9), 5660–5666 (2019). 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 154.S. Dutta, K.B. Devi, M. Roy, Processing and degradation behavior of porous magnesium scaffold for biomedical applications. Adv. Powder Technol. 28(12), 3204–3212 (2017). 10.1016/j.apt.2017.09.024 [Google Scholar] 155.J.M. Seitz, R. Eifler, F.W. Bach, H. Maier, Magnesium degradation products: effects on tissue and human metabolism. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 102(10), 3744–3753 (2014). 10.1002/jbm.a.35023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 156.Y. Xin, K. Huo, H. Tao, G. Tang, P.K. Chu, Influence of aggressive ions on the degradation behavior of biomedical magnesium alloy in physiological environment. Acta Biomater. 4(6), 2008 (2008). 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 157.S. Kovacevic, W. Ali, E. Martínez-Pañeda, J. Llorca, Phase-field modeling of pitting and mechanically-assisted corrosion of Mg alloys for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 164, 641–658 (2023). 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 158.M. Wątroba, K. Mech, W. Bednarczyk, J. Kawałko, M. Marciszko-Wiąckowska et al., Long-term in vitro corrosion behavior of Zn–3Ag and Zn–3Ag–0.5 Mg alloys considered for biodegradable implant applications. Mater. Des. 213, 110289 (2022). 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110289 159.X. Liu, H. Yang, Y. Liu, P. Xiong, H. Guo et al., Comparative studies on degradation behavior of pure zinc in various simulated body fluids. JOM 71, 1414–1425 (2019). 10.1007/s11837-019-03357-3 [Google Scholar] 160.V.M. Rabeeh, S.A. Rahim, S. Kinattingara Parambath, G. Rajanikant, T. Hanas, Iron-gold composites for biodegradable implants: In vitro investigation on biodegradation and biomineralization. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 9(7), 4255–4268 (2023). 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 161.H. Hermawan, A. Purnama, D. Dube, J. Couet, D. Mantovani, Fe-Mn alloys for metallic biodegradable stents: degradation and cell viability studies. Acta Biomater. 6(5), 1852–1860 (2010). 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 162.M. Schinhammer, P. Steiger, F. Moszner, J.F. Löffler, P.J. Uggowitzer, Degradation performance of biodegradable FeMnC (Pd) alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 33(4), 1882–1893 (2013). 10.1016/j.msec.2012.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 163.S.S. Prasad, S. Prasad, K. Verma, R.K. Mishra, V. Kumar et al., The role and significance of magnesium in modern day research-a review. J. Magnes. Alloy 10(1), 1–61 (2022). 10.1016/j.jma.2021.05.012 [Google Scholar] 164.Y. Li, Y. Wang, Z. Shen, F. Miao, J. Wang et al., A biodegradable magnesium alloy vascular stent structure: design, optimisation and evaluation. Acta Biomater. 142, 402–412 (2022). 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.01.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 165.D.E. Erişen, Y. Zhang, B. Zhang, K. Yang, S. Chen et al., Biosafety and biodegradation studies of AZ31B magnesium alloy carotid artery stent in vitro and in vivo. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B A. Biomater. 110(1), 239–248 (2022). 10.1002/jbm.b.34907 [DOI] [PubMed] 166.Z.-Q. Zhang, Y.-X. Yang, J.-A. Li, R.-C. Zeng, S.-K. Guan, Advances in coatings on magnesium alloys for cardiovascular stents—a review. Bioact. Mater. 6(12), 4729–4757 (2021). 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 167.Y. Chen, Z. Xu, C. Smith, J. Sankar, Recent advances on the development of magnesium alloys for biodegradable implants. Acta Biomater. 10(11), 4561–4573 (2014). 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 168.N. Hort, Y.-D. Huang, D. Fechner, M. Störmer, C. Blawert et al., Magnesium alloys as implant materials-principles of property design for Mg–RE alloys. Acta Biomater. 6(5), 1714–1725 (2010). 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 169.G. Wu, J.M. Ibrahim, P.K. Chu, Surface design of biodegradable magnesium alloys-a review. Surf. Coat. Technol. 233, 2–12 (2013). 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.10.009 [Google Scholar] 170.M. Nasr Azadani, A. Zahedi, O.K. Bowoto, B.I. Oladapo, A review of current challenges and prospects of magnesium and its alloy for bone implant applications. Prog. Biomater. 11(1), 1–26 (2022). 10.1007/s40204-022-00182-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 171.M.P. Staiger, A.M. Pietak, J. Huadmai, G. Dias, Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review. Biomaterials 27(9), 1728–1734 (2006). 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 172.G. Uppal, A. Thakur, A. Chauhan, S. Bala, Magnesium based implants for functional bone tissue regeneration-a review. J. Magnes. Alloy 10(2), 356–386 (2022). 10.1016/j.jma.2021.08.017 [Google Scholar] 173.S. Siefen, M. Höck, Development of magnesium implants by aication of conjoint-based quality function deployment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 107(12), 2814–2834 (2019). 10.1002/jbm.a.36784 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 174.D. Bairagi, S. Mandal, A comprehensive review on biocompatible Mg-based alloys as temporary orthopaedic implants: Current status, challenges, and future prospects. J. Magnes. Alloy 10(3), 627–669 (2022). 10.1016/j.jma.2021.09.005 [Google Scholar] 175.M.E. Maguire, J.A. Cowan, Magnesium chemistry and biochemistry. Biometals 15, 203–210 (2002). 10.1023/A:1016058229972 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 176.A. Hartwig, Role of magnesium in genomic stability. Mutat. Res. Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutag. 475(1–2), 113–121 (2001). 10.1016/S0027-5107(01)00074-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 177.C. Theisen, K. Wodschow, B. Hansen, J. Schullehner, G. Gislason et al., Drinking water magnesium and cardiovascular mortality: a cohort study in denmark, 2005–2016. Environ. Int. 164, 107277 (2022). 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 178.K.P. Schlingmann, M. Konrad, Magnesium Homeostasis (Elsevier, Amsteram, 2020), pp. 509–525 179.I. Groenendijk, M. van Delft, P. Versloot, L.J. van Loon, L.C. de Groot, Impact of magnesium on bone health in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone 154, 116233 (2022). 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 180.X. Fang, K. Wang, D. Han, X. He, J. Wei et al., Dietary magnesium intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and all-cause mortality: a dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMC Med. 14(1), 1–13 (2016). 10.1186/s12916-016-0742-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 181.D. Rosenblum, N. Joshi, W. Tao, J.M. Karp, D. Peer, Progress and challenges towards targeted delivery of cancer therapeutics. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 1410 (2018). 10.1038/s41467-018-03705-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 182.K.S. Soppimath, A.R. Kulkarni, W.E. Rudzinski, T.M. Aminabhavi, Microspheres as floating drug-delivery systems to increase gastric retention of drugs. Drug Metab. Rev. 33(2), 149–160 (2001). 10.1081/dmr-100104401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 183.Z. Luo, N. Paunović, J.-C. Leroux, Physical methods for enhancing drug absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 175, 113814 (2021). 10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 184.J.-Y. Runser, M. Criado-Gonzalez, F. Fneich, M. Rabineau, B. Senger et al., Non-monotonous enzyme-assisted self-assembly profiles resulting from reaction-diffusion processes in host gels. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 620, 234–241 (2022). 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.03.150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 185.P.J. Schouten, D. Soto-Aguilar, A. Aldalbahi, T. Ahamad, S. Alzahly et al., Design of sporopollenin-based functional ingredients for gastrointestinal tract targeted delivery. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 44, 100809 (2022). 10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100809 [Google Scholar] 186.Y. Ge, M. Liu, L. Liu, Y. Sun, H. Zhang et al., Dual-fuel-driven bactericidal micromotor. Nano-micro Lett. 8(2), 157–164 (2016). 10.1007/s40820-015-0071-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 187.N.R. Salama, M.L. Hartung, A. Müller, Life in the human stomach: persistence strategies of the bacterial pathogen helicobacter pylori. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11(6), 385–399 (2013). 10.1038/nrmicro3016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 188.D. Bravo, A. Hoare, C. Soto, M.A. Valenzuela, A.F. Quest, Helicobacter pylori in human health and disease: mechanisms for local gastric and systemic effects. World J. Gastroenterol. 24(28), 3071 (2018). 10.3748/wjg.v24.i28.3071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 189.G. Holtmann, C. Cain, P. Malfertheiner, Gastric helicobacter pylori infection accelerates healing of reflux esophagitis during treatment with the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole. Gastroenterology 117(1), 11–16 (1999). 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70544-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 190.S. Kuang, J. Xu, M. Chen, Y. Zhang, F. Shi et al., The influence of pretreatment with PPI on helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 100(47), e27944 (2021). 10.1097/MD.0000000000027944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 191.P. Moayyedi, G.I. Leontiadis, The risks of PPI therapy. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9(3), 132–139 (2012). 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 192.P.M. Ho, T.M. Maddox, L. Wang, S.D. Fihn, R.L. Jesse et al., Risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome. JAMA 301(9), 937–944 (2009). 10.1001/jama.2009.261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 193.A. Koyyada, Long-term use of proton pump inhibitors as a risk factor for various adverse manifestations. Therapies 76(1), 13–21 (2021). 10.1016/j.therap.2020.06.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 194.E. Sheen, G. Triadafilopoulos, Adverse effects of long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy. Dig. Dis. Sci. 56, 931–950 (2011). 10.1007/s10620-010-1560-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 195.J. Li, S. Thamphiwatana, W. Liu, B. Esteban-Fernández de Ávila, P. Angsantikul et al., Enteric micromotor can selectively position and spontaneously propel in the gastrointestinal tract. ACS Nano 10(10), 9536–9542 (2016). 10.1021/acsnano.6b04795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 196.X. Wei, M. Beltrán-Gastélum, E. Karshalev, B. Esteban-Fernández de Ávila, J. Zhou et al., Biomimetic micromotor enables active delivery of antigens for oral vaccination. Nano Lett. 19(3), 1914–1921 (2019). 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b05051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 197.V. Dias, E. Junn, M.M. Mouradian, The role of oxidative stress in parkinson’s disease. J. Parkinsons Dis. 3(4), 461–491 (2013). 10.3233/JPD-130230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 198.S. Bhatt, L. Puli, C.R. Patil, Role of reactive oxygen species in the progression of alzheimer’s disease. Drug Discov. Today 26(3), 794–803 (2021). 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 199.C.S. Carter, S.C. Huang, C.C. Searby, B. Cassaidy, M.J. Miller et al., Exposure to static magnetic and electric fields treats type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 32(4), 561–574.e567 (2020). 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.09.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] 200.B. Perillo, M. Di Donato, A. Pezone, E. Di Zazzo, P. Giovannelli et al., ROS in cancer therapy: the bright side of the moon. Exp. Mol. Med. 52(2), 192–203 (2020). 10.1038/s12276-020-0384-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 201.X. Lou, Z. Chen, Z. He, M. Sun, J. Sun, Bacteria-mediated synergistic cancer therapy: small microbiome has a big hope. Nano-micro Lett. 13(1), 37 (2021). 10.1007/s40820-020-00560-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 202.G. Zhou, E. Goshi, Q. He, Micro/nanomaterials-augmented hydrogen therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8(16), 1900463 (2019). 10.1002/adhm.201900463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 203.Y. Wu, M. Yuan, J. Song, X. Chen, H. Yang, Hydrogen gas from inflammation treatment to cancer therapy. ACS Nano 13(8), 8505–8511 (2019). 10.1021/acsnano.9b05124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 204.C.-L. Liu, K. Zhang, G. Chen, Hydrogen therapy: from mechanism to cerebral diseases. Med. Gas Res. 6(1), 48 (2016). 10.4103/2045-9912.179346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 205.M. Fan, Y. Wen, D. Ye, Z. Jin, P. Zhao et al., Acid-responsive H2-releasing 2D MgB2 nanosheet for therapeutic synergy and side effect attenuation of gastric cancer chemotherapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8(13), 1900157 (2019). 10.1002/adhm.201900157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 206.P. Zhao, Z. Jin, Q. Chen, T. Yang, D. Chen et al., Local generation of hydrogen for enhanced photothermal therapy. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 4241 (2018). 10.1038/s41467-018-06630-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 207.X. Li, B. Dai, J. Guo, L. Zheng, Q. Guo et al., Nanoparticle-cartilage interaction: pathology-based intra-articular drug delivery for osteoarthritis therapy. Nano-micro Lett. 13(1), 149 (2021). 10.1007/s40820-021-00670-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 208.C. Xu, S. Wang, H. Wang, K. Liu, S. Zhang et al., Magnesium-based micromotors as hydrogen generators for precise rheumatoid arthritis therapy. Nano Lett. 21(5), 1982–1991 (2021). 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 209.L. Kong, C. Chen, F. Mou, Y. Feng, M. You et al., Magnesium particles coated with mesoporous nanoshells as sustainable therapeutic-hydrogen suiers to scavenge continuously generated hydroxyl radicals in long term. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 36(2), 1800424 (2019). 10.1002/ppsc.201800424 [Google Scholar] 210.I. De Cock, E. Zagato, K. Braeckmans, Y. Luan, N. de Jong et al., Ultrasound and microbubble mediated drug delivery: acoustic pressure as determinant for uptake via membrane pores or endocytosis. J. Controll. Release 197, 20–28 (2015). 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.10.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 211.H. Lee, H. Kim, H. Han, M. Lee, S. Lee et al., Microbubbles used for contrast enhanced ultrasound and theragnosis: a review of principles to applications. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 7, 59–69 (2017). 10.1007/s13534-017-0016-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 212.Y. Feng, X. Chang, H. Liu, Y. Hu, T. Li et al., Multi-response biocompatible Janus micromotor for ultrasonic imaging contrast enhancement. A. Mater. Today 23, 101026 (2021). 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101026 [Google Scholar] 213.W. Zhou, Y. Zhang, S. Meng, C. Xing, M. Ma et al., Micro/nano-structures on biodegradable magnesium@ PLGA and their cytotoxicity, photothermal, and anti-tumor effects. Small Methods 5(2), 2000920 (2021). 10.1002/smtd.202000920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 214.Z. Wu, J. Li, B.E.F. de Ávila, T. Li, W. Gao et al., Water powered cell mimicking Janus micromotor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25(48), 7497–7501 (2015). 10.1002/adfm.201503441 [Google Scholar] 215.F. Zhang, R. Mundaca-Uribe, H. Gong, B. Esteban-Fernández de Ávila, M. Beltrán-Gastélum et al., A macrophage-magnesium hybrid biomotor: fabrication and characterization. Adv. Mater. 31(27), 1901828 (2019). 10.1002/adma.201901828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 216.K. Xiong, L. Xu, J. Lin, F. Mou, J. Guan, Mg-based micromotors with motion responsive to dual stimuli. Research 2020, 213981 (2020). 10.34133/2020/6213981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 217.M. Kong, X.G. Chen, K. Xing, H.J. Park, Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: a state of the art review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 144(1), 51–63 (2010). 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 218.Z. Limam, S. Selmi, S. Sadok, A. El Abed, Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from crustacean by-products: biological and physicochemical properties. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10(4), 640–647 (2011). 10.4314/ajb.v10i4 [Google Scholar] 219.L. Qi, Z. Xu, X. Jiang, C. Hu, X. Zou, Preparation and antibacterial activity of chitosan nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Res. 339(16), 2693–2700 (2004). 10.1016/j.carres.2004.09.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 220.J.A. Delezuk, D.E. Ramírez-Herrera, B.E.-F. de Ávila, J. Wang, Chitosan-based water-propelled micromotors with strong antibacterial activity. Nanoscale 9(6), 2195–2200 (2017). 10.1039/C6NR09799E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 221.D. Rojas, B. Jurado-Sánchez, A. Escarpa, “Shoot and sense” Janus micromotors-based strategy for the simultaneous degradation and detection of persistent organic pollutants in food and biological samples. Anal. Chem. 88(7), 4153–4160 (2016). 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 222.S. Cinti, G. Valdés-Ramírez, W. Gao, J. Li, G. Palleschi et al., Microengine-assisted electrochemical measurements at printable sensor strips. Chem. Commun. 51(41), 8668–8671 (2015). 10.1039/C5CC02222C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 223.Z. Lin, C. Gao, D. Wang, Q. He, Bubble-propelled Janus gallium/zinc micromotors for the active treatment of bacterial infections. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(16), 8750–8754 (2021). 10.1002/anie.202016260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 224.M. Zhou, T. Hou, J. Li, S. Yu, Z. Xu et al., Self-propelled and targeted drug delivery of poly (aspartic acid)/iron-zinc microrocket in the stomach. ACS Nano 13(2), 1324–1332 (2019). 10.1021/acsnano.8b06773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 225.W. Gao, R. Dong, S. Thamphiwatana, J. Li, W. Gao et al., Artificial micromotors in the mouse’s stomach: a step toward in vivo use of synthetic motors. ACS Nano 9(1), 117–123 (2015). 10.1021/nn507097k [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 226.Q. Cui, T.-H. Le, Y.-J. Lin, Y.-B. Miao, I.-T. Sung et al., A self-powered battery-driven drug delivery device that can function as a micromotor and galvanically actuate localized payload release. Nano Energy 66, 104120 (2019). 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104120 [Google Scholar] 227.M. Moravej, A. Purnama, M. Fiset, J. Couet, D. Mantovani, Electroformed pure iron as a new biomaterial for degradable stents: in vitro degradation and preliminary cell viability studies. Acta Biomater. 6(5), 1843–1851 (2010). 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 228.H. Zhang, W. Zhang, H. Qiu, G. Zhang, X. Li et al., A biodegradable metal polymer composite stent safe and effective on physiological and serum containing biomimetic conditions. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 11(22), 2201740 (2022). 10.1002/adhm.202201740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 229.B. Paul, A. Lode, A.-M. Placht, A. Voß, S. Pilz et al., Cell-material interactions in direct contact culture of endothelial cells on biodegradable iron-based stents fabricated by laser powder bed fusion and impact of ion release. ACS A. Mater. Interfaces 14(1), 439–451 (2021). 10.1021/acsami.1c21901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 230.Y. Su, I. Cockerill, Y. Wang, Y.-X. Qin, L. Chang et al., Zinc-based biomaterials for regeneration and therapy. Trends Biotechnol. 37(4), 428–441 (2019). 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.10.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 231.E. Piskin, D. Cianciosi, S. Gulec, M. Tomas, E. Capanoglu, Iron absorption: factors, limitations, and improvement methods. ACS Omega 7(24), 20441–20456 (2022). 10.1021/acsomega.2c01833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

网址:Recent Developments in Metallic Degradable Micromotors for Biomedical and Environmental Remediation Applications https://c.klqsh.com/news/view/351633

相关内容

Recent Developments in Metallic Degradable Micromotors for Biomedical and Environmental Remediation Applications
Nanostructured metal–organic frameworks and their bio
The krone exchange rate and altered expectations
Seasonal changes of diatom community structure in the Zhalong wetland and its relationship with environmental conditions
Ortigas Center: The connective business district
Five media and entertainment trends to watch in 2025
Orthodontics in Growing Patients: Clinical/Biological Evidence and Technological Advancement 2018
Latest Business and Financial News on China, U.S. Trade War and Negotiations, Breaking News, Headlines and Developments
Media and Entertainment Market Forecast
Environmental health

随便看看